Live data from Hacker News

.self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

hccf.onmy.cloud

371–380 of 410 posts

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#371
post #204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

.io is (British) Indian Ocean (Territory).

I always thought these TLDs were a flight risk to be used in any serious capacity. What if the random state decides you/your business are in violation of [whatever] and kick you off?

What if they sent out a hit squad to your house?

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#372

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I left community college after a week because my "computer" teacher required us to change our monitors to 640x480 and print out ever step that we completed in things like Notepad or Configuring the Desktop and then every day we'd punch it out and would add it to a three ring binder of all the things we've done. Full Color.

if i may rant, my middle school and high school aged kids have to literally take pictures of their homework assignments with their chromebook camera then put it the pictures in a google slides deck then submit the deck through a form all to just turn in their paper HW assignment! ridiculous.

Can’t you just hand it in?

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#373
I’m very confused. This is a web page with an embedded single-page PDF (!?) that gives zero details about how the project would work, be funded, or even look like. What is there to even discuss? Nothing about this seems very “human centered” to me.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#374
post #120

Earlier quoted context omitted.

.internal works fine now.

Both of these are meant for operating a home/private network. .self seems to be geared towards a 'accessible from the everyday net' kind of approach.

Right.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#375
post #232
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Please don't reply like this to comments like this. Just flag them, and if you're feeling extra-helpful, email us (hn@ycombinator.com).

You're right. Though that was a comment with the n-word and a bunch of other explicits, I think a reaction was warranted. But I will keep that in mind next time

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#376
post #333

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I left community college after a week because my "computer" teacher required us to change our monitors to 640x480 and print out ever step that we completed in things like Notepad or Configuring the Desktop and then every day we'd punch it out and would add it to a three ring binder of all the things we've done. Full Color.

640x480 in 16 colors is the resolution as it was prescribed in the Bible.

though shalt not wear garments of mixed pallettes

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#377
reading the comments on the site itself makes me think this is one of those "oh, I think found a way to get free money from governments". It doesn't feel like it's being done by someone with genuine knowledge of domains, nor an actual mission. I sounds more like a "deal maker" figuring out a way to get rich by creating an NPO

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#378
post #244

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The much simpler way to avoid squatting is to make .com domains cost $200 a year. This will instantly end the vast majority of domain squatting on the .com TLD and if people can easily get the .com they need for their business then the other TLDs are not going to have much squatting activity.

I don't get it. How do you handle 10k people wanting, say, garden.com, without a free market?

how about make it round-robin, so all 10k of them get a fair slice of traffic? ;)

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#379
post #262

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I never understood Dreamweaver. The first thing it asked me when making a new website was ... what the resolution of my user's screen is? I don't know that!

Its web development software from the 90s/00s, a period when websites were built by first having a designer meticulously mock everything up in Photoshop on a 640x480 canvas (maybe 800x600 or 1024x768 in later days), that mockup would then be handed over to a web developer (hi, that was me) who would take that mockup, slice it up into a billion little images, and then put them in a wildly complex set of nested HTML ta…

Don't worry, designers still complain about something being 3px off, or a font being weight 700 instead of 800.

Re: .self: A new top-level domain designed to support self-hosting

#380

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We plan to operate a shared mail server than can be used by users of the domain and we will work to ensure it is trusted by imposing usage limits. We will assume that every endpoint in our domain is someone's personal homelab, meaning small-scale use. For large mailing campaigns and newsletters there are plenty of services to choose from that enable those but for just sending personal emails, it should work.

Wait, so self hosting but I don't host my own email? So you guys just want to run your own mailserver and give people custom emails? That sounds like negative utility. That would make hosting an email server on one of your domains harder than hosting it on a .com, so what benefit is this providing?

This entire scheme is devoid of a working knowledge of how anything works. I'm wondering what the rug pull is going to be. Crypto or VC?
Post reply on HN