Live data from Hacker News

The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org

151–160 of 573 posts

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#151

And the Republic response to this is "soc1lism bad!!"

Not even just Republicans, unfortunately. The generation of Americans who grew up in the Cold War were inundated with propaganda about how socialism would destroy America, and then go and say things like this https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/26/us/politics/moderate-demo...

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#152
post #90

People are misreading the conclusion - the Covid related drop is normal and matches previous episodes, but the massive overall drop since 2000 is not. The situation on the ground is unchanged - the amount of labor being generated per person has not really changed, but the overall pie has grown massively around us.

We have one of the worlds most prosperous economies, and half of the US is living in abject poverty while quality of life for everyone is decreasing.

"Abject poverty" is currently defined as living on less that $3 a day and dealing with things like chronic hunger and exposure.

The best approximation would be the homeless population in the US (about 500k people), but even then most homeless would not even qualify.

"Half" is a gross exaggeration.

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#153
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> half of the US is living in abject poverty Anyone who believes this has absolutely no concept of what abject poverty looks like.

This is quickly going to devolve into 'nobody suffers unless their suffering as at least as bad as the worst suffering that exists', so let's just go ahead and get that out of the way and move on to something less pointless.

It's not about being pointless, it's just plain wrong.

The median (not average) household income in the US is 80K USD. p25 is 40K. p10 is 20K. They're struggling, sure.

But I wouldn't call that abject poverty.

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#154

People are misreading the conclusion - the Covid related drop is normal and matches previous episodes, but the massive overall drop since 2000 is not. The situation on the ground is unchanged - the amount of labor being generated per person has not really changed, but the overall pie has grown massively around us.

>the amount of labor being generated per person has not really changed im not really understanding what you mean. i dont get how labor is generated, in particular. do you mean to say the amount of total hours dedicated to labor per person or something else?

Probably to referring to hours worked, eg. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/AWHAETP

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#155
post #14

this is relatively unremarkable for those with an understanding of wage, labor, profit, price and capital. capitalism will always seek to reduce labor cost. during the epoch of neoliberalism it achieved great strides in this by reducing labor power through union busting by both thatcher and reagan in the UK and US respectively. it has also effectively curtailed any increase in the minimum wage for nearly 20 years as…

Marx fails to imagine a world in which labor actually has little to no value. His worldview is primarily that capitalists 'steal' the valuable labor. However it doesn't seem that that is actually the world we are in. Instead the intrinsic value of human labor seems to be slowly trending towards zero. And it kind of makes sense, same has happened with oxen labor, horse labor, etc.

low skilled human labor is going to zero. high skill approaches infinity.

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#156
post #111
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We have one of the worlds most prosperous economies, and half of the US is living in abject poverty while quality of life for everyone is decreasing.

>and half of the US is living in abject poverty Source? All the ones I know of use questionable methodology like: "being able to afford a 2 bedroom apartment at median wage".

Out of curiosity, what is your expected baseline of what the average person and family in the US should be able to afford?

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#157
post #76
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not the commenter you replied to, but one thing to note is that capital gains tax (at least in the context of investments in corporate equities) is applied after corporate taxes. Profits and reinvested earnings are taxed as profits, and they're two of the key components to valuing an equity. As such, when comparing income tax and capital gains, you should add the impact of corporate taxes. Incidentally, corporate tax…

If the income was earned through dividends, maybe this would be a reasonable argument. Most of the time stock just gets bought and sold by investors rather than the company itself though, so it's not clear why corporate tax would have anything to do with this. Sure, the stock price should somehow be tied to the actual value of the company, but for a while now it's been mostly indistinguishable from a Ponzi scheme oth…

I agree that in a bull market, many corporations are not purchased and sold at book value. That said, we are on the largest bull-run in history, so we shouldn’t treat this as the norm, and base all our long-term decisions on the current situation.

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#158
post #108
post #90

Earlier quoted context omitted.

We have one of the worlds most prosperous economies, and half of the US is living in abject poverty while quality of life for everyone is decreasing.

I'm going to go on a limb and say half of the US is not living in abject poverty? Nor can I get behind the idea that quality of life for folks is on the down trend.

> Nor can I get behind the idea that quality of life for folks is on the down trend.

There is a pretty clear down-trend post-COVID here.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/publications/2025-economic-we...

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#159
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not the commenter you replied to, but one thing to note is that capital gains tax (at least in the context of investments in corporate equities) is applied after corporate taxes. Profits and reinvested earnings are taxed as profits, and they're two of the key components to valuing an equity. As such, when comparing income tax and capital gains, you should add the impact of corporate taxes. Incidentally, corporate tax…

I've often wondered why we don't abolish corporation tax and instead tax capital gains and dividends like normal income.

Because capital gains taxes really discourage selling which gums up the economy

Re: The labor share of income in the US is at its lowest post-war level

#160
post #60

I think this is part of a long term development where technology and globalization slowly erode workers bargaining power. Basically you only build a factory in the US if you can keep labour costs low enough and the manufacturing automated enough so that you can still compete with other manufacturing hubs.

The longer graph (starting at 1947) shows the shift in 2001 on more startlingly https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PRS85006173 Corporate profit vs Labor income divergence (only up to 2018) https://fredblog.stlouisfed.org/2018/08/corporate-profits-ve...

Fascinating. The 2001 shift aligns well with China's entry into the WTO.
Post reply on HN