What's the point of even trying to obfuscate this with such a simple method? Could at least have hidden the targeted features by storing their hashes or embedding a bloom filter or similar
Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
21–30 of 817 posts
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#22[flagged]
The irony.
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#23[flagged]
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#24[flagged]
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#25[flagged]
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#26What do you mean you don't know where the bug is coming from?
No, I absolutely didn't make it up, how could you accuse me of that?
Does anyone know when this regex isn't working? I double checked it 27 times, I even asked the LLM. They all say this regex should be finding these dates.
Weird, suddenly all the conversations are breaking when I feed them into this other tool? Something about UTF-8 errors, but I'm sure I'm only using ASCII?
I do try to take care to make sure the things I build can be used by other people even when they care about different things. I care about understandably, determinism (as it relates to computing), and repeatability (because I want to be able to trust the systems I use).
If y'all would be willing to try to account for use cases of others, and try not to break them... that would be nice.
Please note: that generally when you modify something that belongs to someone else without telling them... things should be expected to break.
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#27[flagged]
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#28[flagged]
Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#29Re: Claude Code is steganographically marking requests
#30[flagged]