The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
71–80 of 377 posts
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#72[flagged]
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#73More and more we see the relationship with authoritarianism (police) and tyranny (those in power) out in the open. We see this with the protests in Germany for Gaza. We see this in Britain with freedom of speech taken away from Palestine supporters. And we see this shamelessly occurring from the Trump world. I used to balk at those who were too worried at growing government power, but this is a wake up call. Protecti…
And how do those protections work when the current administration doesn't even respect the law, and no one will enforce it against them?
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#74More and more we see the relationship with authoritarianism (police) and tyranny (those in power) out in the open. We see this with the protests in Germany for Gaza. We see this in Britain with freedom of speech taken away from Palestine supporters. And we see this shamelessly occurring from the Trump world. I used to balk at those who were too worried at growing government power, but this is a wake up call. Protecti…
Quite a leap to bring Gaza and Palestine into a discussion about the US ambassor in Belgium.
The link is police abusing their allowed powers to silence free speech and protest.
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#75The only point of inauthenticity is that neither journalist suffered any lasting physical harm.
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#76Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#77For additional context, tensions are already high surrounding the US ambassador after he directly insulted multiple Belgian politicians and also attempted to interfere with local criminal judicial proceedings.
[flagged]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolf_warrior_diplomacy
This kind of antagonism comes from the top. China mostly toned it down recently because it is ideology-driven counter-productive, we will see how long it takes the US to do the same.
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#78More and more we see the relationship with authoritarianism (police) and tyranny (those in power) out in the open. We see this with the protests in Germany for Gaza. We see this in Britain with freedom of speech taken away from Palestine supporters. And we see this shamelessly occurring from the Trump world. I used to balk at those who were too worried at growing government power, but this is a wake up call. Protecti…
Quite a leap to bring Gaza and Palestine into a discussion about the US ambassor in Belgium.
It's a shame someone is so sensitive to a subject that it can't even be used as additional support of another argument.
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
> So if Bill White, the US ambassador, pays to rent out the park for, I think it was 2 weeks, they can have whoever they want removed from this public park. Including any reporters. That would be by private security not police though. You aren't generally arrested for annoying an event organiser.
If you get trespassed then wouldn't the police get involved?
Aside: why do Americans always talk about trespassing as something that is done to the trespasser? Isn't trespassing the act itself? If I plant myself in your livingroom uninvited, then surely I am trespassing. Why do so many people instead say that I "get trespassed"?
Re: The US ambassador had Belgian police stop our reporting
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quite a leap to bring Gaza and Palestine into a discussion about the US ambassor in Belgium.
Only if you’re not following along. The link is police abusing their allowed powers to silence free speech and protest.
If you'd actually read the post you'd know that its about the the US ambassador being an asshole and the Belgian police doing their job (quickly removing a supposed 'active threat' from an event - because that's the only information they had - they later realized their mistake and that the 'active threat' was just a journalist asking inconvenient questions - but at that point the damage was done and the journalist wasn't let back into the event.