Live data from Hacker News

Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

quesma.com

571–580 of 809 posts

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#571
post #226

I see a lot of people writing about how expensive the hardware to run these local models is - but see no mentions of the Intel Arc Pro B50/B60/B70 which seem like decent value if you're not interested in Apple kit (as much as anything can be decent value in the current status quo). I just got a B70 with 32GB RAM for the equivalent of $1200 (incl. sales tax and import duties to my non-US location, so presumably it cou…

I got B70 few days ago. Running on CachyOS. 9070XT on PCIe x16 and B70 on the x4.

ROCm nightly was pretty easy to setup and get up running. The 9070XT has been a decent card for my use cases.

But the SYCL ecosystem versions. Absolutely horrendous and everything is hundred commits behind. Vulkan is probably the only way forward with this card.

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#572
post #50

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The maths there is pretty undeniable, but it is not where I'd make the split. Having a machine that can run some modest local LLMs, like the Gemma 4 12B, is really worth it. I don't know how much serious hands-free agentic coding I will ever do on my MacBook alone, but I do know that I would not have got so far into understanding this without tinkering with local models, llama.cpp, LM Studio, and LM Studio and all th…

> Having a machine that can run some modest local LLMs, like the Gemma 4 12B, is really worth it. Cloud models are (much) faster, they don't consume so much power/generate heat, they have much bigger (LLM) context, they're much more precise and they have a much wider (engineering) context of the given problem. Except privacy and use cases that are blocked by cloud models (e.g. reverse engineering), local LLMs are cur…

I agree completely. I think local AI is best limited to purpose built SLMs; all this craze around running quantized coding LLMs has taken the attention off SLMs.

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#573

It's fun to run a model locally, but I don't think the economics make sense for anyone just trying to use models atm. It's absurdly cheap to use the same model via openrouter in comparison. Seriously, just put $10 into openrouter and play with models that are cheap but bigger than what you'd reasonably be able to run locally like deepseek v4 flash (unquantized). You'll be surprised by how far that $10 goes for a mode…

Those are all pre-rugpull prices though. Give it a year.

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#576
post #56

The article is based on running Qwen 3.6 on a 128GB MacBook Pro. For reference, a 128GB MBP currently starts at $6699 USD [0] Some people will be happy to pay that premium for privacy, but at roughly 10X the cost of a MacBook Neo, that money could also buy a lot of credits on OpenRouter or frontier labs. [0]: https://www.apple.com/shop/buy-mac/macbook-pro/14-inch-space...

I’m running the same model on a 48GB MBP with a q4 quant and it’s pretty decent. You definitely don’t 128GB. That’s the scale for 70B models at q8 or something.

> I’m running the same model on a 48GB MBP with a q4 quant and it’s pretty decent.

Context size?

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#577

I love my MacBook Pro M5 128GB RAM and I love qwen3.6. BUT DO NOT buy this MacBook if you plan on doing serious coding using local LLMs with it. The reason is simple: your fingers will burn and your head will explode from the noise. Running any kind of sophisticated job on the very laptop you are using is just not viable. Sure you can use it in clamshell mode, but forget touching it while working with AI coding or ag…

You could use an external keyboard?

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#578
post #415

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you want to do coding with a local LLM your best bet is a 6 year old Nvidia 3090 which is substantially more powerful than the highest end overhyped Apple product for 1/5th the price.

32GB V100

Meh. I'd rather have 2x RTX 5060 Ti.

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#579

I love my MacBook Pro M5 128GB RAM and I love qwen3.6. BUT DO NOT buy this MacBook if you plan on doing serious coding using local LLMs with it. The reason is simple: your fingers will burn and your head will explode from the noise. Running any kind of sophisticated job on the very laptop you are using is just not viable. Sure you can use it in clamshell mode, but forget touching it while working with AI coding or ag…

I'm surprised no one has else has mentioned - low power mode.

With no speculative decoding, using high power mode, I get 80 t/s on 35B A3B - and it gets hot and spins up. On low power mode I get 38 t/s - no fans, cool to warm laptop.

If you currently don't use speculative decoding and you start using it, it can nearly offset the difference between high and low power, and it's night and day experience.

I almost always keep my laptop on low power mode.

Re: Qwen 3.6 27B is the sweet spot for local development

#580

I think the sweet spot right now is 2x 3090s and a pcie 4 motherboard with 64-128 gb of ddr4 ram, you can build this right now for $3k and it runs qwen 27b/35b stupid fast at int4.

I know how to build PCs but suck at picking parts, would you happen to have a recommended build or links to people who've done similar ones? Heck I'll click on an affiliate link to support the author of the build :-)
Post reply on HN