A native graphical shell for SSH
probablymarcus.com
A native graphical shell for SSH
1–10 of 239 posts
Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#2Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#3Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#4Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#5Defeats the purpose of the shell. The shell is for CLI interaction.
Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#6Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#7Defeats the purpose of the shell. The shell is for CLI interaction.
SSH protocol also isn’t just for CLI work. It supports file transport (eg SFTP), TCP/IP forwarding and even SOCKS HTTP proxying.
You also used to be able to run GUI applications over SSH via X11.
Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#8Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#9Defeats the purpose of the shell. The shell is for CLI interaction.
No. A shell is any user interface. Windows shell is explorer.exe and it used to be possible to change that via a config line in a system INI file. SSH protocol also isn’t just for CLI work. It supports file transport (eg SFTP), TCP/IP forwarding and even SOCKS HTTP proxying. You also used to be able to run GUI applications over SSH via X11.
Re: A native graphical shell for SSH
#10As someone managing various servers, both at home and at work, I see how this can be really useful. I see it not in the production space yet but rather in the experimenting, using a Linux machine as a second compute device!
So regarding your last point, I'm convinced. I think it is useful! The one fact that is bugging me is that now it requires a client specific app, with GUI, on my PC and I wonder if using ssh port forwarding could reduce the surface. I mean I wonder if either having a rich client that executes commands via ssh or a rich server (including Web Server) with ssh port wouldn't suffice, so that I can avoid installing stuff on the server AND on my computer.