> there are two separate personas that you need to “create”: The user persona and the buyer persona. Even more important: stop using personas, start using actual people. I've experienced many startups make unforced errors by conflating people into personas. A better way is to tag people with attributes, such as specific interests, explicit concerns, tasks to be done, usage goals, learning preferences, and the like. W…
Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
11–20 of 61 posts
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#12> there are two separate personas that you need to “create”: The user persona and the buyer persona. Even more important: stop using personas, start using actual people. I've experienced many startups make unforced errors by conflating people into personas. A better way is to tag people with attributes, such as specific interests, explicit concerns, tasks to be done, usage goals, learning preferences, and the like. W…
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#13How true is it you’ll need to persist under extreme duress unable to pay yourself a salary? Relevant for us with kids / families where we provide the family’s income.
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#14Maybe a simple question I didn’t see here: paying yourself a salary? How true is it you’ll need to persist under extreme duress unable to pay yourself a salary? Relevant for us with kids / families where we provide the family’s income.
Investors who imply you shouldn't take a salary are no bueno.
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#15Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#16Seems like a particularly risky trap for bootstrapped companies desperate for revenue. At the same time the best companies I see out there are relentlessly customer focused.
How do you draw the line between “design partner” and becoming someone’s consultant.
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#17Maybe a simple question I didn’t see here: paying yourself a salary? How true is it you’ll need to persist under extreme duress unable to pay yourself a salary? Relevant for us with kids / families where we provide the family’s income.
I will add a section. Pay yourself a salary at the very latest the moment you've raised funding. If a VC objects to you doing that, get a different VC. You're in for the long run, and support from your family etc. is important, and you're already taking on a huge risk by pooling all your risk in one company, vs. the VC who is happily diversified. Investors who imply you shouldn't take a salary are no bueno.
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#18I see a pattern where companies end up becoming consulting firms with a bit of proprietary tech. Then all their efforts are put into a handful of clients. The companies call them “design partners” but they’re basically clients. Seems like a particularly risky trap for bootstrapped companies desperate for revenue. At the same time the best companies I see out there are relentlessly customer focused. How do you draw th…
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#19Maybe a simple question I didn’t see here: paying yourself a salary? How true is it you’ll need to persist under extreme duress unable to pay yourself a salary? Relevant for us with kids / families where we provide the family’s income.
I will add a section. Pay yourself a salary at the very latest the moment you've raised funding. If a VC objects to you doing that, get a different VC. You're in for the long run, and support from your family etc. is important, and you're already taking on a huge risk by pooling all your risk in one company, vs. the VC who is happily diversified. Investors who imply you shouldn't take a salary are no bueno.
Like equivalent to what your developer salary would be? Less? More because you’re a CEO now?
I basically have minimum $ amount I would accept for “developer job I absolutely love” that I know sustains my family comfortably without much extra fun or savings. Is that a good bar?
Re: Halvar's Guide to Entrepreneurship
#20I see a pattern where companies end up becoming consulting firms with a bit of proprietary tech. Then all their efforts are put into a handful of clients. The companies call them “design partners” but they’re basically clients. Seems like a particularly risky trap for bootstrapped companies desperate for revenue. At the same time the best companies I see out there are relentlessly customer focused. How do you draw th…
The point is: For anything you build, you can find 1 customer. It's only when there's multiple customers that like the product and want to improve it where you move from "consulting" or "custom development" to "product".