Live data from Hacker News

Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

cbsnews.com

61–70 of 238 posts

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where do you draw the line? If the employer wants you to install a 2FA app on your phone, do you demand a separate phone or alternate 2FA device for that and mark yourself as a troublemaker? Or do you just do what 99.8% of the staff does and install the app?

One of the biggest banks in the US forces staff and contractors alike to install a proprietary 2fa app on their personal devices. if you can get a company phone, you can't finish activating the MDM, to install the company 2fa app, without first using that 2fa app on your personal device. Even a company yubikey can't be activated without the 2fa appp, which again, you can't get on a company device without first instal…

What about people who don’t have smartphones? Not everyone has one.

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#62
post #3

Android used to have an "office hours" setting which would prevent specific email accounts from notifying you outside of your specified times. I had my work GMail set to notify only between 0800 (so I could check for a "don't come in" message) and 1700 Mon-Fri. Of course, it didn't account for holidays / sick leave etc, but it was good at prevent me from panic checking every ping. I wish that was a feature on modern…

> Or, indeed, WhatsApp and Signal.

You can use Shelter from FDroid to create a separate work profile in the phone, with separate accounts, and then pause it after office hours.

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#63
post #33

This seems mostly good for restaurants, some concerns I had from the title seem to be handled reasonably. It’s not preventing “can anyone cover Saturday” messages in a group chat. Just the case where shift changes are made and workers are _required_ to work outside their contracted hours. Seems this would fit with what good food service employers do, would put pressure on the more abusive fast food chains. Maybe the…

It only bans uncontracted oncall. If your job description includes on call responsibilities (and compensates for them appropriately), it doesn’t appear that would be a problem?

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#64
post #3

Android used to have an "office hours" setting which would prevent specific email accounts from notifying you outside of your specified times. I had my work GMail set to notify only between 0800 (so I could check for a "don't come in" message) and 1700 Mon-Fri. Of course, it didn't account for holidays / sick leave etc, but it was good at prevent me from panic checking every ping. I wish that was a feature on modern…

I use 2 different email apps for exactly this reason. I can check my work email if I need to, but I don’t want notifications.

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#65
post #33

This seems mostly good for restaurants, some concerns I had from the title seem to be handled reasonably. It’s not preventing “can anyone cover Saturday” messages in a group chat. Just the case where shift changes are made and workers are _required_ to work outside their contracted hours. Seems this would fit with what good food service employers do, would put pressure on the more abusive fast food chains. Maybe the…

If you make over $130k then you make enough that you can be worked 24/7 without violating a $15 minimum wage + 1.5x over 40 hours per week.

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#66
post #10

It kind of baffles me that this needs to be a bill. I guess I'm lucky that I've never worked for a company that required me to be constantly online. (I work remotely for a US company, work European working hours, and nobody requires me to be online outside of them.)

You are lucky. This bill is for the unlucky, because luck is not a strategy as it relates to labor rights and protections.

Yeah, now I see that my message came out a bit differently than I wanted it to. What I wanted to say is that it sucks this needs to be a law instead of just being common sense.

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#67
post #58

There's a weird incuriosity in the responses here for a place that calls itself Hacker News. "This doesn't happen to me" is about the least interesting or useful response you could have to someone telling you something happens to them. Someone is telling you the world works differently for them than it does for you, which means you've got an opportunity to learn something new about the world and expand your model. Ev…

> Someone is telling you the world works differently for them than it does for you, which means you've got an opportunity to learn something new about the world and expand your model.

...than it does for you, which means there's an opportunity for someone to expend resources verifying and characterizing the claimed difference.

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#68
post #49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most of the roles I've had involved irregular and long hours. In most cases, I've been happy to take these roles. The article isn't clear how exactly this is intended to work. I think no surprise hours that aren't recognized in the terms of employment makes sense. But also I think I should be able to agree to being available if I am willing to be. Remote Michigan tech workers already have enough trouble as tech compa…

This is simple. You're on call, you're paid to be on call. Anyone accepting anything different is encouraging this behaviour. Unionize and this goes away.

[deleted]

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#69
post #58

There's a weird incuriosity in the responses here for a place that calls itself Hacker News. "This doesn't happen to me" is about the least interesting or useful response you could have to someone telling you something happens to them. Someone is telling you the world works differently for them than it does for you, which means you've got an opportunity to learn something new about the world and expand your model. Ev…

> Someone is telling you the world works differently for them than it does for you, which means you've got an opportunity to learn something new about the world and expand your model. ...than it does for you, which means there's an opportunity for someone to expend resources verifying and characterizing the claimed difference.

It’s easy to dismiss something by saying “it’s not been my experience”. It would be a huge waste of time if every such claim requires expending resources verifying and characterizing the difference. There should be a higher bar for discourse on HN.

Re: Michigan bill would bar employers from requiring after-hours coms with workers

#70

Lots of privilege in this thread showing. This is the equivalent of "what global warming, it was so cold today". Please remember that just because you aren't expected to have consistent unpaid after-hours comms doesn't mean that others don't. Bills like this would help a lot of people who are victims of "can you just take a look at this real quick" at 6pm. It does need to be at the country level though, otherwise emp…

Buddha was exceptional because he actually WANTED to know what was going on outside of his luxury palace.

Most people just want to pretend everything is fine. They sleep better at night.

Post reply on HN