Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 57 posts

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#21
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It sets dangerous precedent Edit: guys, it was a joke! /s

Dangerous to whom exactly?

Anyone who's not able to populism their way into a cash blast for their org.

I am not a billionaire. But I don't want to risk losing my job or moving out of state so that the dialysis people can cash a paycheck.

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#23
Muni is not doing well. They've adjusted service to address a huge budget deficit, and the buses are noticeably more crowded and less frequent.

Given how SF has a big global immigrant population, there's a lot of World Cup spirit in the air. Also because Santa Clara is a host stadium.

Housing demand is back up. Not just single family homes but also condos.

Bars are supposedly closing because the 20-somethings are drinking less. Yet at the same time apparently the youngins have discovered the charm of Vesuvio...? Anchor still has not reopened. Woods (IMO) is now the preferred beer spot for locals.

The recall of the Sunset supe was a big deal. Fight over cars on the Great Highway is ongoing.

Pride is in full swing this weekend. Bay To Breakers was great as always. Weather is decent. The "SF doom spiral" story is being discussed less. I.e. SF seems safer. It's a good time to live in SF.

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#24
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dangerous to whom exactly?

Anyone who's not able to populism their way into a cash blast for their org. I am not a billionaire. But I don't want to risk losing my job or moving out of state so that the dialysis people can cash a paycheck.

Dialysis people is really interesting phrasing. Care to elaborate what you mean?

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#25
post #6

IPOs pushing up housing prices New Waymo car models rolling out The laser thing in front of city hall Pride month, parades this weekend Antisocial guy harassing Scott Weiner on social media at Dolores Park Lurie administration, after initially making progress on crime and cleaning up the streets seems to be stalling out Supervisor Jackie Fielder back from long mostly unexplained absence that was maybe due to her ille…

As an occasional visitor, the city seems a lot cleaner and safer this year (I went last month) than the last times I visited in 2024 and 2019.

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#26
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So ridiculous that folks will spend millions personally to avoid paying their fair share in taxes. Is the alternative really that bad Sergey? You would be paying a similar amount, and the money would actually go to some use, as opposed to being blown on a political fight.

Whenever someone uses the word “fair” about taxes it always seems to mean that they shouldn’t pay more but others should. There also some good economic reasons that a “wealth tax” is a bad option compared to other types of taxes.

If they paid the 35% that I pay, then it would be fair.

It sounds like you think billionaires should pay close to 0%?

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#27
post #6

IPOs pushing up housing prices New Waymo car models rolling out The laser thing in front of city hall Pride month, parades this weekend Antisocial guy harassing Scott Weiner on social media at Dolores Park Lurie administration, after initially making progress on crime and cleaning up the streets seems to be stalling out Supervisor Jackie Fielder back from long mostly unexplained absence that was maybe due to her ille…

Interestingly I have found many tech circles in SF would rarely discuss ultra local things like supervisor politics. I don’t even think it’s taboo, I just have found folks tend to not be super informed on any of it. Lurie does seem to capture plenty of political mindshare though.

That area still has some 'gold rush' mentality to it, where people want to get in, make their money and get out. That doesn't foster much of a long-term attitude that pays attention to local politics. Also some of the local politics are totally psychotic, like the guy harassing Scott Wiener.

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#28
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It sets dangerous precedent Edit: guys, it was a joke! /s

Dangerous to whom exactly?

People who want to use the current system to innovate and create jobs. The current system of venture capital often produces these situations when people have a huge amount paper "wealth". But this wealth is all pretty hypothetical. It's not like some of the "billionaires" can buy 1 billion things from the McDonald's Dollar Menu. It's all tied up in stock that can't be sold for a variety of reasons. Moreover, it's quite likely that the "billionaire" will end up with far less than $1b when he/she retires, even if everything is wildly successful.

Yet that big number encourages greedheads to try to tax something that doesn't really exist.

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#29
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So ridiculous that folks will spend millions personally to avoid paying their fair share in taxes. Is the alternative really that bad Sergey? You would be paying a similar amount, and the money would actually go to some use, as opposed to being blown on a political fight.

Whenever someone uses the word “fair” about taxes it always seems to mean that they shouldn’t pay more but others should. There also some good economic reasons that a “wealth tax” is a bad option compared to other types of taxes.

Mind sharing these good economic reasons?

Re: Ask HN: What is everyone in SF talking about?

#30
post #9
post #7

California Billionaire Tax - November 2026 ballot. One off 5%. Sergey Brin leading the fight against it, donating millions to try to kill it.

So ridiculous that folks will spend millions personally to avoid paying their fair share in taxes. Is the alternative really that bad Sergey? You would be paying a similar amount, and the money would actually go to some use, as opposed to being blown on a political fight.

fair_share = fair_share + 1
Post reply on HN