DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
devblogs.microsoft.com
DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
1–10 of 49 posts
Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#2 So a total of 46% of the crashes were due to this rogue force-unload of a DLL. This is a case of bucket spray, where a single underlying cause generates a large number of different types of crashes.Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#3The story of software development through the ages.
Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#4That's some doggedly determined back tracing to uncover an unexpected heisenbug (loose meaning). So a total of 46% of the crashes were due to this rogue force-unload of a DLL. This is a case of bucket spray, where a single underlying cause generates a large number of different types of crashes.
Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#5Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#6Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#7I see posts like this, this deep dive into the call stacks and am always humbled and reminded of the limits of my knowledge about computers and programs.
Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#8Part two: https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20260626-00/?p=11...
Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#9> The good news for the shell32 team is that they are off the hook; they are the victim. The bad news is that we don’t know who the culprit is. The story of software development through the ages.
Re: DLL that was not present in memory despite not being formally unloaded
#10I see posts like this, this deep dive into the call stacks and am always humbled and reminded of the limits of my knowledge about computers and programs.