I suppose this is a good opportunity to ask, why do people get so affected by DVCS hosts going down? You can work locally with Git without uploading every change. Despite the constant reported GitHub downtime, I have not ever been adversely affected even once, since pushing and pulling are done every few days and I can freely branch/commit/merge locally.
Codeberg Is Down
31–40 of 53 posts
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#32Re: Codeberg Is Down
#33I suppose this is a good opportunity to ask, why do people get so affected by DVCS hosts going down? You can work locally with Git without uploading every change. Despite the constant reported GitHub downtime, I have not ever been adversely affected even once, since pushing and pulling are done every few days and I can freely branch/commit/merge locally.
Whenever GitLab, Codeberg, BitBucket and, mostly, GitHub goes down, a lot of the software and websites you use can't be updated, including dependencies of your software that you're pulling from npm, for instance.
Finally, companies use code forges mostly for the ease of doing code reviews through Pull Requests/Merge Requests. Developers rarely, if ever, actually merge branches locally, before having it reviewed by peers in one of these code forges.
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#34I suppose this is a good opportunity to ask, why do people get so affected by DVCS hosts going down? You can work locally with Git without uploading every change. Despite the constant reported GitHub downtime, I have not ever been adversely affected even once, since pushing and pulling are done every few days and I can freely branch/commit/merge locally.
Teams I've worked on for the last several decades aim to push 10-20 builds per day to external alpha testers, so any downtime in Github is going to be an impediment.
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#35Has anyone used the Repository Mirroring Feature [1] to mirror repos across self-hosted Forgejo/Codeberg/Github? How effortless is it? Ideally, I'd like to only ever push repos/branches to my self-hosted Forgejo, and have those changes automatically reflected on Codeberg/GH without thinking about it. [1] https://forgejo.org/docs/v15.0/user/repo-mirror/
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#36I suppose this is a good opportunity to ask, why do people get so affected by DVCS hosts going down? You can work locally with Git without uploading every change. Despite the constant reported GitHub downtime, I have not ever been adversely affected even once, since pushing and pulling are done every few days and I can freely branch/commit/merge locally.
Do you not spend much time writing and discussing issues or reviewing code?
That isn’t as convenient as an all-in-one tool, and might not be what the user you’re responding to is doing. But it’s doable.
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#37Earlier quoted context omitted.
Codeberg runs open source Forgejo, and you could on-prem that too (for no license cost), if it suits your needs. GitLab is more powerful in some ways, but early startups might want to look at Forgejo first.
> but early startups might want to look at Forgejo first. Sorry, but there are a million things to do. Paying someone to self-host Forgejo isn't even on that list. We'll just pay someone at the moment.
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#38> For the time being, it appears that all three servers are without power. This strikes me as odd, only three servers?
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
Do you not spend much time writing and discussing issues or reviewing code?
You could use separate tools for those tasks. JIRA/Bugzilla/etc. for issue tracking, Sublime Merge or equivalent for comparing a dev branch to a main branch, and CI/CD with Azure Pipelines or whatever the “modern” equivalent of Jenkins is. That isn’t as convenient as an all-in-one tool, and might not be what the user you’re responding to is doing. But it’s doable.
Re: Codeberg Is Down
#40Only well known project on Codeberg that comes to mind is Zig