Feels like I need to repeat myself more than once a day now: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48697258 > These companies providing tokens, whether SOTA or not, that want to IPO are so fucked as time goes on. >Can't sell their SOTA models, only slightly better than the open source models for the models they can sell, cost 20x to 50x for good models, a TAM that consists almost solely of developers, with no customer…
Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
31–40 of 211 posts
Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#32Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#33[flagged]
Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#34Where can I get the API?
Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
This exactly. YC companies literally steal competing company 1:1 and you turn blindeye. Then a thief steals from a thief to give it out at better prices than you write low quality comment. Shame that America will greet 250th anniversary with this kind living in it.
[flagged]
Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#36Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#37First impression: Third-party benchmarks or gtfo. Personally, I've never heard of either of these companies before. We're just supposed to take their word that they've matched the best models on the market? Sakana describes their model as a "Orchestration Model." Does that mean that it's actually a bunch of different models glued together?
Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#38asian is bad wording. this is a japanese startup backed by khosla ventures. japan is an ally of west. the title makes it sound like a chinese company did this.
(I'm based in US - I use the best tech for the task).
Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#39Re: Asian AI startups launch Mythos-like models
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
It is scary.
It is not. Where's the danger ? We will need to adapt, as in every technology progress, but what do you think will happen ? Realistically ? Don't feed the fearmongering. Yes, we're disrupting the status quo, if that's the danger, then welcome to the world.
As was highlighted in previous discussions, the industrial revolution took 80 years to start benefiting workers. The continued impact of automation at least contributed to the rise of right wing extremism and an erosion of democracy all over the west. Now we face a development that has the potential to be faster than those that came before, in the context of political systems more fragile and worse equipped to manage the change.
So yeah, disrupting the status quo can absolutely be dangerous. It has been dangerous (and deadly) in the past and in the present.