Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 76 posts

Re: Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

#4
post #2

MacBooks with their unified memory behave like a slow GPU with enormous amount of video RAM. So you can run large smart models slowly. Dedicated GPUs have less video RAM so can run smaller less smart models quickly.

Do Mac Pros provide more headroom? noob here, noob questions

Re: Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

#5
If you want a massive MacBook anyway then it's great. They are decent for local LLMs, awesome for local image models and it's a MacBook so AppleCare+ has your back. IMO it's a no brainer if you wanted a MacBook anyway but it's a poor choice if your reason to buy it is to run LLMs.

Re: Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

#7
My opinion is that you should wait for 6-12 months before making a purchase either way.

Open weight models are getting good. With GLM 5.2 now chasing Opus, I'm very excited to see a smaller model's distillation.

Plus, the OLED MacBook Pro should be released by then.

Re: Ask HN: MacBook vs. Dedicated GPU for LLM

#8
post #4
post #2

MacBooks with their unified memory behave like a slow GPU with enormous amount of video RAM. So you can run large smart models slowly. Dedicated GPUs have less video RAM so can run smaller less smart models quickly.

Do Mac Pros provide more headroom? noob here, noob questions

Idk why you’re being downvoted for asking a question. Pending specs they _could_ provide more headroom for a larger model but they would still be limited by the CPU and it’s associated bus speeds.
Post reply on HN