U.S. allows Anthropic to release Mythos AI to ‘trusted’ US organizations

Post by threethirtytwo » Sat, Jun 27, 2026, 3:52 AM UTC

mlinsey wrote: post #59

I understand why Anthropic might not want to fight this particular one in court, because they're trying to convince the administration to let them move forward. But would another company who is not on the trusted partner list and has less to lose taking on the admin have standing to sue here? On the basis of the export control being illegal and this putting their business at a disadvantage vs. competitors with access

Post by ElProlactin » Sat, Jun 27, 2026, 3:53 AM UTC

cute_boi wrote: post #290

ElProlactin wrote: post #286

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Taiwan, perhaps, but they're playing a long-term tactical game rather than a "invade the country we don't like this week" game. So one of the world's biggest and most rapid military build-ups in history that is largely intended to give China the ability to seize a democratic country by force by 2027 over any US/Western efforts to protect it is OK because...it's "a long-term tactical game"? Note that China is not ju…

China has a economy which they can't risk. People keep saying same thing for Russia, but they haven't been able to defeat even Ukraine. At this point I am afraid of US government than China...

Post by Dig1t » Sat, Jun 27, 2026, 3:54 AM UTC

goatlover wrote: post #281

exabrial wrote: post #199

How does my small company become a "trusted partner"?

This administration doesn't care about small companies anymore than it cares about regular Americans.

Post by [deleted] » Sat, Jun 27, 2026, 3:55 AM UTC

wyrdcurt wrote: post #287

tyre wrote: post #154

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is a pithy internet comment, but terrible advice. Between the Chinese government and Anthropic, I know which one I'd rather send tokens to. For all of the problems of the US, for-profit corporations, data harvesting, etc. the CCP (and, perhaps more troublesome, its allies) is far less likely to align with your interests.

Less likely to align with your interests maybe, but have you considered that not everyone has the same interests? Personally I am much more concerned about handing my data over to the government that actually has power over me and labels dissenters terrorists than I am with the government overseas that has no direct effect on my life... well, other than providing alternative LLMs with permissive licenses that can be…

Post by nozzlegear » Sat, Jun 27, 2026, 3:57 AM UTC

SpicyLemonZest wrote: post #177

alanwreath wrote: post #86

I’m not sure what the US government is trying to do. At first it seems like they are just trying to stifle some company that said no. Now they are just doing free publicity. It’s like never before have I wanted to try something out as much as this. They’re in effect saying “nothing else is as powerful as what Anthropic put out”. Even though that might not really be the case it’s what it sounds like.

Is there any evidence at all that would convince you that they're trying to mitigate real risks that actually exist?