Mixing Visual and Textual Code
41–47 of 47 posts
Re: Mixing Visual and Textual Code
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The simple text editor has a lot to answer for when it comes to how we think about programming I wonder whether those that used punch cards said the same about those punch cards? It’s weird how our mobile devices aren’t programmed using keyboards/text as input devices. Or our microwaves. Or refrigerators. Programmers are stuck with text because their programming paradigms are stuck in a text-based paradigm, hence A…
> I wonder whether those that used punch cards said the same about those punch cards? Oh, absolutely. One statement/line per card, the first 5 columns reserved for labels (how's that for significant whitespace?), the 6th to signal line continuation, the last eight for arbitrary comments/line numbers? People loathed it.
A visual programming canvas is free of that, and thus can display connections and relationships far more deeply and conveniently than text-based languages.
It's the 2D nature of our languages that has a lot to answer for.
Re: Mixing Visual and Textual Code
#43We have the complete AST in almost every IDE. Why are we not learning to render abstracted code and systems from that??
Re: Mixing Visual and Textual Code
#44Re: Mixing Visual and Textual Code
#450) https://tinkeros.github.io/WbTempleOS/Doc/DolDocOverview.htm... 1) https://hackmag.com/security/templeos