Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
1–10 of 137 posts
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#2[deleted]
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#3We're #1!
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#4Mass surveillance is bad, until I'm in charge of it. -- Parents demanding "age verification" laws
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#5It is from a VPN Company, so YMMV. But I do agree there is surveillance happening, but the amount of data is way too much to fully examine. Makes one wonder if this is one of the reasons the US Gov. (and others) are so into AI.
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#6VPNs are great and all but many that are well advertised here in North America are a huge source of attacks, abuse, etc. so it’s pretty desirable just to block them. They sometimes have agreements with residential ISPs to get around the bans.
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#7Mass surveillance is bad, until I'm in charge of it. -- Parents demanding "age verification" laws
It's not parents demanding 'age verification' laws.
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#8Mass surveillance is bad, until I'm in charge of it. -- Parents demanding "age verification" laws
>Parents demanding "age verification" laws
I keep seeing this claim, but where is it coming from?
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#9It is from a VPN Company, so YMMV. But I do agree there is surveillance happening, but the amount of data is way too much to fully examine. Makes one wonder if this is one of the reasons the US Gov. (and others) are so into AI.
mullvad has been one of the good ones.
Re: Countries are competing to see which can carry out mass surveillance the best
#10- does anyone have actual proof that surveillance does not effectively curb terrorism or something along those lines?
- i keep seeing the same arguments everywhere "ThEy WaNt To CoNtRoL Us" etc
- how do you propose catching terrorists then?