Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

31–40 of 323 posts

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#31

Post by jdietrich »

irdc wrote: post #14
negergreger wrote: post #9

[flagged]

AI is busy destroying my art and my livelihood. Fighting back is about as psychotic as drapetomania[0] was. 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drapetomania

Has any group of workers ever "won" a long-term victory against a new technology? There are plenty of short-term concessions made in the face of powerful trade union opposition, but I can't think of any technology that was just stopped dead to appease workers with obsolete skills.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#33

Post by elric »

carlosjobim wrote: post #23

[flagged]

What a load of crock.

FOSS licenses were obviously written in the spirit of sharing with humans. Some later licenses made the license less amenable for sharing with corporations because some authors didn't feel like they were being treated fairly. Some authors today have similar feelings about their code being used by Gen AI. It is perfectly fine for authors to want to place restrictions on how they want others to use their work.

> Step out of the FOSS swamp, step in to human dignity.

What is that even supposed to mean?

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#35

Post by lenerdenator »

gryfft wrote: post #26
lenerdenator wrote: post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Unless you don't copy the license terms

You edited your comment while I was replying, and merely copying the license does not cover many other possible restrictions.

I didn't edit anything.

I did choose the wrong word, though. Comply, not copy.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#37

Post by john_strinlai »

wolttam wrote: post #22

Folks... read the actual tweet. They literally didn't vibe code it - they copy-pasted another project.

wait just a second, that's not how to use HN. youre supposed to read the title -> get upset and write a comment -> argue.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#39

Post by josephg »

lenerdenator wrote: post #11
irdc wrote: post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Papermark is AGPL; Corgi must release all its changes.

That means they're not complying with the license terms. Which would be stealing. Like I said it would be.

Thats not what you said. You said "copy the license terms". Copying a license isn't the same as complying with one.

Though it looks like in this case they didn't do either.

Re: Hey Nico, you didn't vibe code your data room but stole it from Papermark

#40

Post by lenerdenator »

irdc wrote: post #18
lenerdenator wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That means they're not complying with the license terms. Which would be stealing. Like I said it would be.

So we're in violent agreement then?

Brutally violent agreement. kicks shin, shakes hand
Post reply on HN