Any chance you wrote it up anywhere? I'm somewhat interested in RAG and a worked example would be nice.
Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
51–60 of 108 posts
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#52[deleted]
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#53Thanks for creating this, this is really fun to play around with! Is the code for this out in the open if someone would want to peek under the hood?
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#54[deleted]
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#55Searched for "sexual exploration". One of the results i got returned was from corinthians and read: The wife doesn’t have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise also the husband doesn’t have authority over his own body, but the wife does. I'm so glad this religion of peace sees consent as profoundly unimportant
You have to keep reinterpreting it until it aligns with whatever the masses currently consider to be true. This has been going on forever. The current hot reinterpretation is to say we’ve been wrong in what the scriptures teach about same-sex relationships and aaacktshually.. it’s fine.
Jesus doesn't say anything very explicit about homosexuality but he's pretty clear that no one should be rich and it's never ok to kill. I've been seeing a lot of hot reinterpretations on that front.
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#56Can we have apocryphal books too, like Moses 6 & 7 :)
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#57Excellent! Just searching "giants" pops our many more of these characters than just Nephilim and Goliath.
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#58Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#59Did you include the Deuterocanonical books?
No, and it's not KJV. Maybe NKJV? I searched Eccl7:13 "Consider the work of God: for who can make that straight, which he hath made crooked?" and it came back with: Ecclesiastes 7:12-15 For wisdom is a defense, even as money is a defense; but the excellency of knowledge is that wisdom preserves the life of him who has it. Consider the work of God, for who can make that straight which he has made crooked? In the day o…
That would be WEB, I'm guessing because WEB is public domain.
Re: Show HN: Bible as RAG Database
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Consider this: neither man nor women, when fully committed to each other as if they are one, and maybe even if they are not committed, can control the emotions and impulses inflicted upon them by the other. It's ok to set aside misgivings about the whole thing and how the world has corrupted it all and just explore the possibility of depth and beauty and love. You don't have to chose the worst interpretation of thing…
Describing my interpretation of a passage that quite literally says "your body belongs to someone else" as a 'worst possible reading' would be comically hilarious if not for the rather sinister undertones. Your interpretation of this passage is reading far more into things and doing far more justifying than mine is
From your earlier comment:
> It is saying that each of them can use the others body as they like, without regard for the other
This is your own interpretation and it shows your bias. The bible (and I assume other religious texts) is easy to misinterpret due to bias. It's not written like a technical documentation where the tiniest details are specified; thus giving plenty opportunities to subject a text to arbitrary meaning.
This was a problem even in biblical times. 2 Peter 3:16
> as also in all of his letters, speaking in them of these things. In those, there are some things that are hard to understand, which the ignorant and unsettled twist, as they also do to the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
The solution is study. Not superficially reading and guesstimating, but to study the text itself, the surrounding verses, the context. Who wrote it? Who's the audience? What, more broadly, are they trying to say? Crosschecking with other verses in bible. Things like that (See Proverbs 2:1-5, Psalm 1:2, Joshua 1:8, Psalm 119:97, 1. Timothy 4:15)
Coming back to the text in question (1. Corinthians 7:4). The surrounding verses provide context on what this is about:
> To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is good for them to remain single, as I am. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion. > Let the husband give to his wife her due, and let the wife also do likewise to her husband. > Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent for an appointed time [...].
Put simply: "marry and enjoy sex." That's basically what the apostle Paul is trying to say here. But of course, that alone doesn't debunk your interpretation.
Paul also wrote Ephesians 5:28-33
> In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. A man who loves his wife loves himself, for no man ever hated his own body, but he feeds and cherishes it [...] Each one of you must love his wife as he does himself; on the other hand, the wife should have deep respect for her husband.
Also vers 25:
> Husbands, continue loving your wives, just as the Christ also loved the congregation and gave himself up for it.
There are further verses, but this comment is getting too long.