The analog31 comment about "yellow squiggles for logic errors" is a genuinely interesting design problem. Linters do this in IDEs, but the reason it hasn't made it into general productivity software is that spell errors have a clear ground truth (the dictionary), while logic errors require understanding intent. The difficulty scales completely differently.
In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
31–40 of 127 posts
Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#32When you work in multi language environment the squiggles are often less than useful. They are just visual noise I must fight or ignore because the system tries to guess the language of the text I'm writing and it is most often wrong. And manually switching language settings between each interaction is way to inconvenient.
Or just set the proofing language for the entire text to None to banish all spelling and grammar diagnostics.
Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#33I want to see yellow squiggles under logic errors. That will keep the programmers busy for a while.
It can point out things like unreachable code, redundant if predicates, suspicious casts and countless other things through realtime semantic analysis of code.
Of course there are infinitely more kinds of logic errors that simple static analysis like this can’t pick up, but an LLM “analysis” might.
Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#34Teachers put red squiggles under misspelled words long before Word.
Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#35I wish there was a button on my keyboard that I could press when there's a red squiggle in the last N words, which would cause my computer to fix the underlined word to its best guess. It should wait until a few words later, to get more context. It should flash the new word as it's being inserted, so I can easily see what it's done. Spell check used to be kind of lousy, but with AI I imagine it would have a very high…
> with AI I imagine ... I think that might be just imagination - android autocorrect in particular got sufficiently worse that I finally turned it off (I still use it as a "typing assist" - it only displays choices that I can tap to replace, or (more often) ignore.)
Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#36Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#37That’s some heavy duty corpo-brain to be introducing your friend with ”He was on the team that did X”.
Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#38Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#39> Tony was an early fan of the magic/comedy team Penn and Teller. A friend and colleague attended a show and hung out afterward to ask the duo to sign a photo for his friend Tony. “He was on the team that did the red and green squiggles in Word.” That’s some heavy duty corpo-brain to be introducing your friend with ”He was on the team that did X”.
Re: In memory of the man who put red and green squiggles under words
#40> Tony was an early fan of the magic/comedy team Penn and Teller. A friend and colleague attended a show and hung out afterward to ask the duo to sign a photo for his friend Tony. “He was on the team that did the red and green squiggles in Word.” That’s some heavy duty corpo-brain to be introducing your friend with ”He was on the team that did X”.
This feature is from a different time, though. The people working at big tech these days clearly don't care as much about the output of the stuff they work on.