Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Tag

anthropic.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

101–110 of 200 posts

Re: Claude Tag

#101

Post by jhrmnn »

ruszki wrote: post #91
nozzlegear wrote: post #71

> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.

And this is their circular reasoning of their valuation. “See, here is our company made to worth X by our product, because it can make a company worth X.” And yet, the product made something really unreliable. And nobody bats an eye on the market. But hey, SpaceX successfully sold that they would generate 30 trillion dollars of revenue.

Reliability is one property of a product. And it’s quantitative, not qualitative, so it all comes down to trade-offs

Re: Claude Tag

#102

Post by buremba »

handfuloflight wrote: post #87
buremba wrote: post #70

It's interesting to hear that 60% of PRs at Anthropic is created by the Slack bot. While building a Slack bot is easy, making it look like an AI teammate is pretty hard. This is exactly the gap we’re working on with Lobu.ai — disclosure: I’m the founder. The hard problem is giving a shared agent durable organizational memory and a real isolated environment where it can safely access company systems and perform work.…

Why did you build on OpenClaw?

It's not built on OpenClaw, it uses Pi the harness that powers OpenClaw. We were using the GTM for multi-tenant OpenClaw when there was hype but quickly moved away from it as OpenClaw is a nightmare in terms of security.

Re: Claude Tag

#103

Post by ctoth »

nycdatasci wrote: post #58
prodigycorp wrote: post #47

We ought to rename HN to "The Claude Blog". This is a minor feature update to a slack plugin.

I spoke with a (potentially biased) member of technical staff @ Anthropic today who claimed that tags w/ multi-player capability is the biggest thing they've shipped since Claude Code.

As someone who has Claude and Codex both bridged into a MOO along with other humans I can 100% believe this. It really is a different paradigm that you have to experience. Of course a MOO is already set up for social programming, so it will be interesting to see what platforms evolve (or find themselves coming round again) to facilitate this.

Re: Claude Tag

#104

Post by NewsaHackO »

nozzlegear wrote: post #71

> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.

How are Anthropic's production applications poor quality? Other than memory use (which unfortunately is the industry standard nowadays) Claude Code is pretty solid.

Re: Claude Tag

#105

Post by richardw »

nozzlegear wrote: post #71

> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.

How much do you think it’s holding them back? Market share seems to be surviving the lack of quality vs the other players.

Or possibly: they’re focusing where it matters?

Re: Claude Tag

#106

Post by cco »

RIP to Glean?

For enterprises already with an Anthropic MSA, hard to see the argument to purchase a third party, like Glean, over this.

Re: Claude Tag

#107

Post by Insanity »

NewsaHackO wrote: post #104
nozzlegear wrote: post #71

> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.

How are Anthropic's production applications poor quality? Other than memory use (which unfortunately is the industry standard nowadays) Claude Code is pretty solid.

Literally on the HN homepage today: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48645386

Re: Claude Tag

#109

Post by MeetingsBrowser »

NewsaHackO wrote: post #104
nozzlegear wrote: post #71

> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.

How are Anthropic's production applications poor quality? Other than memory use (which unfortunately is the industry standard nowadays) Claude Code is pretty solid.

Claude code is by far the buggiest piece of software I interact with, If the underlying model weren’t so good, I would never opt to use it.

It takes multiple seconds to launch, random lines disappear in the scroll back, it’s internal state gets messed up causing the TUI to show duplicate and/or offset lines, and it frequently causes some kind of GPU buffer corruption causing the entire terminal env to show garbage.

Re: Claude Tag

#110

Post by nijave »

NewsaHackO wrote: post #104
nozzlegear wrote: post #71

> Today, 65% of our product team’s code is created by our internal version of Claude Tag. Given the reliability and general product quality of the Anthropic product team's code, this doesn't sound like a selling point.

How are Anthropic's production applications poor quality? Other than memory use (which unfortunately is the industry standard nowadays) Claude Code is pretty solid.

Their "safety" system that arbitrarily flags things.

Tons of examples of innocuous strings setting it off and sometimes with financial impact like the OpenClaw/hermes thing (just having the word "hermes" would insta deplete your quota and start charging you API rates in extra usage)

Post reply on HN