Smells like someone's gassing Mythos back up.
Elevated error rate across multiple models
91–100 of 293 posts
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#92 I don’t prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude and figuring out what to do. My job is to write loops.
— Boris Cherny, head of Claude Code
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#93Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#94Earlier quoted context omitted.
"curl -fsSL https://pi.dev/install.sh | sh" — seriously? That tells me a lot about the whole project, unfortunately.
Yeah, totally reasonable comment given the utter security that must come from anthropic with their installer, amiright? oh wait... "curl -fsSL https://claude.ai/install.sh | bash" (right from https://claude.com/product/claude-code ) Further - what the flicking fuck do you think an installer is going to do on your system? Not run any commands? Because I've written installers for every platform... they ALL can run comm…
And you can simply look at the installer by pulling it up in the browser.
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#95I suppose it's a good time to encourage people trying out pi[1] with any cheap model from the openrouter rankings page[1]. [1] https://pi.dev/ [2] https://openrouter.ai/rankings
Except I was having connection issue and errors through open router too
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#96Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#97Appstoreconnect too
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#98Earlier quoted context omitted.
"curl -fsSL https://pi.dev/install.sh | sh" — seriously? That tells me a lot about the whole project, unfortunately.
I am genuinely curious what it tells you, as "curl https//.. | sh" has long been an enormously popular approach to distribution in the open source world. Homebrew, to name just one example, advertises a similar method. (pi.sh also documents other install methods, like `npm`, on their homepage) If trust and security is the issue, unfortunately "better" ideas like hashpipe [1] never achieved critical mass [1] https://n…
What about better ideas like installing from source, or using a package manager? Or even flatpaks.
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
>> What can your company do? Hire some Developers?
Developers who can code without LLMs will go extinct in couple years and there will be legends about them, you should at least have some decent open weight model as a backup
I'm not sure if I'd want to code without an LLM anymore. That said, there will always be open models.
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
What exactly is a developer in a scenario where no one can code?
As long as I'm alive (and not senile) there will always be at least one developer who can code I'm not using AI coding tools yet, and even if they force me at gunpoint to use them at work no one can force me to in my spare time I'm not too worried about the case where no one can code anymore because that will be after I'm dead
That wasn't the premise of the question.