Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Elevated error rate across multiple models

status.claude.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

71–80 of 293 posts

Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models

#71

Post by efficax »

jwr wrote: post #38
yanis_t wrote: post #18

I suppose it's a good time to encourage people trying out pi[1] with any cheap model from the openrouter rankings page[1]. [1] https://pi.dev/ [2] https://openrouter.ai/rankings

"curl -fsSL https://pi.dev/install.sh | sh" — seriously? That tells me a lot about the whole project, unfortunately.

it tells you they're just like basically every other CLI targeting project for the last 15 years? I mean is it a big security hole we all accept, yes, it is. But it's not really indicative of much. That's also how I install rust.

Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models

#73

Post by halfmatthalfcat »

dpedu wrote: post #60
halfmatthalfcat wrote: post #6

Incredible how we can claim productivity increases when its either Claude or Github shitting the bed every other day. It must even itself out to a net neutral gain in the long term.

I don't understand this comment. At worst, we're just back to the baseline - working without AI help.

Yes, that's what the comment means.

We are back to the baseline. The availability of our tools isn't adding anything in the long term because the productivity increase we get from the tooling is negated by the time we're back to doing it the old fashioned way due to downtime, so there is no claimed productivity increase espoused by the pontificators of the tooling.

Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models

#74

Post by efficax »

secretslol wrote: post #33
spiderfarmer wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If that 0.07% downtime was holding me back I wouldn't publicly admit that.

'Claude for Government' is the only one with 0.07% downtime, claude.ai has 0.89% downtime and claude code 0.74% - imo, that's a lot of downtime!

over a year, 0.89% is around 3 whole days of downtime

Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models

#75

Post by deaton »

dpedu wrote: post #60
halfmatthalfcat wrote: post #6

Incredible how we can claim productivity increases when its either Claude or Github shitting the bed every other day. It must even itself out to a net neutral gain in the long term.

I don't understand this comment. At worst, we're just back to the baseline - working without AI help.

With atrophy to our not-AI ability to do things

Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models

#76

Post by horsawlarway »

jwr wrote: post #38
yanis_t wrote: post #18

I suppose it's a good time to encourage people trying out pi[1] with any cheap model from the openrouter rankings page[1]. [1] https://pi.dev/ [2] https://openrouter.ai/rankings

"curl -fsSL https://pi.dev/install.sh | sh" — seriously? That tells me a lot about the whole project, unfortunately.

Yeah, totally reasonable comment given the utter security that must come from anthropic with their installer, amiright?

oh wait...

"curl -fsSL https://claude.ai/install.sh | bash"

(right from https://claude.com/product/claude-code)

Further - what the flicking fuck do you think an installer is going to do on your system? Not run any commands? Because I've written installers for every platform... they ALL can run commands.

So what exactly is the complaint in this comment? If you want to go read the install script - knock yourself out (or hell, point your agent at it...).

Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models

#80

Post by npodbielski »

keeptrying wrote: post #67

It would be hilarious if they don't know how to fix it because this was built by "running loops calling Claude" and they haven't the faintest idea of the present underlying architecture. :)

Maybe they have DeepSeek subscription for that occasion?
Post reply on HN