I suppose it's a good time to encourage people trying out pi[1] with any cheap model from the openrouter rankings page[1]. [1] https://pi.dev/ [2] https://openrouter.ai/rankings
"curl -fsSL https://pi.dev/install.sh | sh" — seriously? That tells me a lot about the whole project, unfortunately.
Elevated error rate across multiple models
61–70 of 293 posts
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#62Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#63Who is GLM 5.2?
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#64Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#65I suppose it's a good time to encourage people trying out pi[1] with any cheap model from the openrouter rankings page[1]. [1] https://pi.dev/ [2] https://openrouter.ai/rankings
"curl -fsSL https://pi.dev/install.sh | sh" — seriously? That tells me a lot about the whole project, unfortunately.
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#66Imagine a future where Anthropic holds your company hostage because no one can code properly anymore by hand and demands paying 200% higher price for the usage. What can your company do?
Use an Anthropic competitor?
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#67:)
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#68I hear that 100% of code at Anthropic is coded by Claude, so this was caused by Claude. And also, no one but Claude can fix Claude
Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#69Re: Elevated error rate across multiple models
#70I request an official statement from Anthropic explaining how they're going to limit outages in the future. Elevated errors almost always means its down for me and I can't be that unlucky statistically speaking. It seems that Anthropic does not have a good grip on the ops side of things.