Live data from Hacker News

Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

manualdousuario.net

141–150 of 171 posts

Re: Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

#142

This feels like I'm reading a comment written by anti-video game moms in the early 90s talking about the stupid unfashionable nerds and how they were ushering in a frightening new age of fewer values and greater social isolation. I dunno, I'd love to have elf-like abilities to see systems of energy in the world around me that the human eye can't see, like wind patterns, and be able to zoom in on plants and animals in…

People already walk around with skins created for themselves. Clothing choices, hair styling, tanning, tattoos, piercings, colored contacts, fur suits, teeth sharpening, surgery for changing the shape of various parts of their body, and probably more that I'm not thinking of at the moment.

I don't think the people who would make AR avatars would exceed the groups of people who do the more uncommon forms of the above. A very niche thing.

Re: Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

#145
I feel like there is a lot pf potential for display-based AR in a glasses form factor. I wouldn't want to dismiss that outright. However, the concern about sensors (cameras and microphones) in the glasses is also real, despite them adding potentially the most value to those devices.

The tech will make its way into commercial applications and assistive technology. Beyind that, things can go a couple of ways:

- There is a killer application with mass appeal and thise glasses become common in public

- Consumer devices will lose their cameras due to large scale pushback. This will kill one of their major AI-related selling points (images as context). Microphines, although potentially equally intrusive, are more likely to stay.

- Comsumer devices will fade away in their entirety.

Re: Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

#146

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They are literally deforming his ears, as you can see in this near-profile photo. If you wear these for more than 5-10 minutes at a time you will either find them painfully uncomfortable or you will damage your ear cartilage. The might have worked great as part of an integrated helmet or something, as glasses they completely fail. https://www.tomsguide.com/news/live/snap-specs-launch-live-l...

Yup. You're supporting my point, right? People see stuff like that and don't buy it as a result. The emperor doesn't have new clothes, and nobody is acting like he does.

His employees and the lickspittle tech blog press are

Re: Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

#147
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In this instance, it's directed at people who are literally at the top of the world, having amassed almost unthinkable power and influence, and want to start a fashion trend specifically to grow their business empires. So yeah, it's a tiny bit different than bullying a classmate for having bad eyesight.

> it's directed at people who are literally at the top of the world The very first sentence in the article associates people who wear these with "pervs". So no, this is not merely directed at "the top of the world". As an aside: VRs were "the cool thing" in the 90's and 00's. They never became practical, and fell out of favor. "Normal" people never stopped mocking those who used them. Now that Meta has made glasses t…

> The very first sentence in the article associates people who wear these with "pervs".

But they're literally the target market. Nobody else needs a hidden camera on their face.

Re: Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

#148

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is why gopros exist.

I mean, this is logically no different than saying that we shouldn't use smartphone cameras because DSLRs exist.

Ah yes, because DSLRs are hands free?

Re: Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

#149
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I find it to be an acceptable use of mockery, one of the most powerful cultural methods of exposing that the emperor has no clothes

I'm not finding it to be any different from "Four eyes!"

... These are people with fine vision, wearing ugly glasses by choice. It's not at all comparable.

I can criticize anyone's choices. Needing glasses is not a choice. Wearing Meta creep-shot raybans is a choice i will never stop criticizing

Re: Tacky men with ridiculous glasses want you to wear them too

#150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A GoPro with a chest or hat harness would take much better videos

The benefit of glasses is that you know for sure what they're recording cause they're recording pretty much what you're looking at. A GoPro on your chest could be angled weirdly and you'd have no idea.

> hat harness
Post reply on HN