Live data from Hacker News

Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs

spur.us

21–30 of 189 posts

Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs

#21

Walked past a TV and it was advertising a security guard. Why does a TV need security software?

Because most people (HN is not a representative sample set) are not willing to pay the real price of a TV if it wouldn't be subsidized by adtech.

Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs

#25
post #11

This turned out to be more ethical than I thought. I'd thought there wasn't any consent at all, or the actual mention of proxying was buried in a 20 page EULA.

Yeah, this does seem somewhat reasonable. I get that most users will probably accept it without thinking twice, but if you’re going to do something like this, this is at least a fairly upfront and consenting way of doing it. For the TV platforms where this isn’t allowed, you have to wonder if apps are still doing it but just completely secretly, and trying to hide their tracks as well.

I think the person you were responding to was being sarcastic.

Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs

#28

It's not Smart TV apps specifically, it's all free apps. They have to monetize those somehow, don't they? And you get upset when you see ads, don't you? Basically it's either this or pay for your apps.

Not sure if this is ironic, but I know it's possible for apps to exist without being monetized. I'm using Paint.net right now.

Re: Nearly half of LG smart TV apps contain residential proxy SDKs

#30

It's not Smart TV apps specifically, it's all free apps. They have to monetize those somehow, don't they? And you get upset when you see ads, don't you? Basically it's either this or pay for your apps.

I pay for apps whenever possible, in some cases it just isn't. Also, you have to trust that paid apps aren't also doing this shit.
Post reply on HN