191–200 of 248 posts
Yep, its basically a scam to charge you more tokens and provide less compute. You cant even guarantee WHAT model you get. Or if they downgrade you. Or if you 'offend corporate sensibilities' and they misdirect or lie. The only way to get good returns on a model is to run it yourself. Quit paying for corporate bullshit.
Never ever subscribe. Let them bankrupt themselves on the altar of safety!
I feel like I get a lot of what this article presents as "hidden" by using this process: - "Read `description` and create a specification, implementation guide, and checklist." - "Ask clarifying questions. If any of those questions has a clear best recommendation, please select that yourself and record that in "autorecommendations.md". - "Have codex and antigravity review each of these and work to consensus." These a…
What are you using exactly to have claude code natively interact with codex and antigravity? Mind sharing your prompts?
I feel like I get a lot of what this article presents as "hidden" by using this process: - "Read `description` and create a specification, implementation guide, and checklist." - "Ask clarifying questions. If any of those questions has a clear best recommendation, please select that yourself and record that in "autorecommendations.md". - "Have codex and antigravity review each of these and work to consensus." These a…
is it strictly necessary to use different models or can you get similar results by doing the same thing but just using eg Codex in different agents & persona? curious if you've compared this
> I’m underwhelmed by how Anthropic is presenting the behavior of their application. If you ever need a record of the logic a used by YOUR AGENT during a session. Nope, not your agent, if you're not running it locally. You just get to use it in whatever way they allow (also see the whole OpenClaw backlash and claude -p changes), unless there'd be regulation and laws around this (which there aren't and would be lobbie…
They would rather spend time and focus hardening against open models stealing their intelligence than make their tooling better for the people who use them. Proprietary technology is fun /s What a waste of time
Well yes exactly, because they have billions of investments riding on it and why would anyone semi-bankrupt their org paying API rates for Anthropic, if a hypothetical DeepSeek V5 Pro would have almost all of Opus capabilities at that point, due to immense distillation?
This is not just Anthropic. Almost all big AI companies, including OpenAI and Google, hide their model's actual reasoning. This is because revealing the raw reasoning exposes exactly how the AI processes information. These companies spend in huge amounts on R&D to develop a thinking process that is superior to their competition. Exposing those thinking mechanics to competitors would completely defeat the purpose of t…