Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
1–10 of 382 posts
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#2[dead]
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#3As far as I can tell from the news, Flock is only used to commit crimes.
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#4Check your town's website for correspondence with your state's chapter of the ACLU in regards to Flock cameras. If your police chief (not an elected official) is installing them then contact your local ACLU chapter about it. These are 4th amendment violations.
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#5Check your town's website for correspondence with your state's chapter of the ACLU in regards to Flock cameras. If your police chief (not an elected official) is installing them then contact your local ACLU chapter about it. These are 4th amendment violations.
To the contrary, little of what Flock does would be restricted by the 4th amendment. The cameras are in public, and neither the government nor individual citizens need authorization to film people in public.
Many Flock cameras are also privately owned, too.
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#6Check your town's website for correspondence with your state's chapter of the ACLU in regards to Flock cameras. If your police chief (not an elected official) is installing them then contact your local ACLU chapter about it. These are 4th amendment violations.
To the contrary, little of what Flock does would be restricted by the 4th amendment. The cameras are in public, and neither the government nor individual citizens need authorization to film people in public. Many Flock cameras are also privately owned, too.
All flock cameras are privately owned, by flock. They install them at a charge per the jurisdiction that orders them and pays the subscription costs… those subscription fees allow Mr Local Law Abuser to lookup any license plate it has read, when, where, with a picture of the vehicle.
You’d be surprised how many there are.
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#7Check your town's website for correspondence with your state's chapter of the ACLU in regards to Flock cameras. If your police chief (not an elected official) is installing them then contact your local ACLU chapter about it. These are 4th amendment violations.
To the contrary, little of what Flock does would be restricted by the 4th amendment. The cameras are in public, and neither the government nor individual citizens need authorization to film people in public. Many Flock cameras are also privately owned, too.
https://www.wired.com/story/carpenter-v-united-states-suprem...
https://www.eff.org/cases/us-v-jones
There has been plenty of past rulings that indicate long term collection of data is not something that the fourth amendment had baked in.
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#8Check your town's website for correspondence with your state's chapter of the ACLU in regards to Flock cameras. If your police chief (not an elected official) is installing them then contact your local ACLU chapter about it. These are 4th amendment violations.
To the contrary, little of what Flock does would be restricted by the 4th amendment. The cameras are in public, and neither the government nor individual citizens need authorization to film people in public. Many Flock cameras are also privately owned, too.
Wrong. See Carpenter v US.
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#9So glad we got them kicked out of Mountain View.
Re: Flock-Powered Police Chiefs Stalking Women Shows Why Warrants Are Needed
#10[flagged]