Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
41–50 of 50 posts
Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#42Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#43Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#44Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#45Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#46Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#47Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#48Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#49This is exactly what we built Mira for. It's self-hosted, bring-your-own-model/BYOK, and most importantly, open source.
You point it at your own API keys (e.g. OpenRouter or a local model) so nothing leaves your infra, and it runs as a code reviewer on PRs.
It's also ridiculously quick at reviewing (benchmarks at ~77s) because your PRs aren't sitting in a queue on a cloud somewhere (alternatives are > 5 minutes)
We're working really closely with our users to build the best possible code reviewer. Feedback and contributions are highly encouraged.
Re: Ask HN: What tools are you using for AI-assisted code review?
#50Besides local review via codex and Claude code, we are using GitHub Copilot with custom instructions. We just assign it as a reviewer in GitHub and a couple minutes later, the review is done. It raises a lot of issues which are valid and which I never had found. https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/tutorials/customize-code-...
what custom instructions did you give it? standard stuff about your practices?