Live data from Hacker News

Canadian government spent $46.8M on a secret Palantir contract

theijf.org

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: Canadian government spent $46.8M on a secret Palantir contract

#3
All the loudest anti trump leaders are his friends. Couple days ago there was an nyt report that macron and trump talk on personal numbers extending the last syllable of first name. Emmanuelllll Donalllllld

It's only us general public that suffers while we console ourselves that maybe they are cheating him just go sleep peacefully

Re: Canadian government spent $46.8M on a secret Palantir contract

#5
Not wanting to sign up for an account to read the article, but since this is for their military, it wouldn't surprise me if it's for their PRISMA and/or Gotham systems.

There aren't a lot of companies making this type of advanced tech, and definitely no Canadian ones doing it.

PRISMA in use by Ukraine: https://x.com/clashreport/status/2061006336188424477

Gotham: https://www.palantir.com/platforms/gotham/

Re: Canadian government spent $46.8M on a secret Palantir contract

#6
This isn't terribly surprising. I'm sure the Canadian military has a great many contracts with US military and intelligence companies. Palantir has been around a long time doing military work. It also doesn't seem to be a terribly large contract as far as these things go.

Still, given Palantir's more recent work with ICE and other work with extremely poor ethics, it would be good to see the Canadian military find alternative sources for whatever intel they get from them.

Re: Canadian government spent $46.8M on a secret Palantir contract

#8
post #6

This isn't terribly surprising. I'm sure the Canadian military has a great many contracts with US military and intelligence companies. Palantir has been around a long time doing military work. It also doesn't seem to be a terribly large contract as far as these things go. Still, given Palantir's more recent work with ICE and other work with extremely poor ethics, it would be good to see the Canadian military find alt…

It's not Intel they get, it's like a data analytics platform they rent that ticks all the regulatory boxes but it's consolidating from data sources they already have.

I'm fairly confident nobody would've cared or even known about Palantir if it was still Biden's term. Like how nobody cares what the western neolib blob buys from Israeli tech companies for instance.

https://dimse.info/canada/

Re: Canadian government spent $46.8M on a secret Palantir contract

#9

Not wanting to sign up for an account to read the article, but since this is for their military, it wouldn't surprise me if it's for their PRISMA and/or Gotham systems. There aren't a lot of companies making this type of advanced tech, and definitely no Canadian ones doing it. PRISMA in use by Ukraine: https://x.com/clashreport/status/2061006336188424477 Gotham: https://www.palantir.com/platforms/gotham/

> There aren't a lot of companies making this type of advanced tech, and definitely no Canadian ones doing it.

The number of CEOs that brag their products are designed to kill people, and used to kill people is pretty limited. How about you pick any company that DOESN'T DO THAT ...

In fact, can we make that a law please?

Re: Canadian government spent $46.8M on a secret Palantir contract

#10
post #9

Not wanting to sign up for an account to read the article, but since this is for their military, it wouldn't surprise me if it's for their PRISMA and/or Gotham systems. There aren't a lot of companies making this type of advanced tech, and definitely no Canadian ones doing it. PRISMA in use by Ukraine: https://x.com/clashreport/status/2061006336188424477 Gotham: https://www.palantir.com/platforms/gotham/

> There aren't a lot of companies making this type of advanced tech, and definitely no Canadian ones doing it. The number of CEOs that brag their products are designed to kill people, and used to kill people is pretty limited. How about you pick any company that DOESN'T DO THAT ... In fact, can we make that a law please?

Do you feel better that Lockheed Martin's (or pick your favorite defense contractor) CEO isn't open and honest about what their products are designed for? Is it better that they just use terms like "lethality"?
Post reply on HN