Live data from Hacker News

Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

nature.com

11–20 of 29 posts

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#11

I really wanted to make a career in tomography. But had only one elective from another department and didn't know how to make it into this stream.

It’s difficult. Medical devices are not easy for a small business to break into and the big manufacturers don’t typically hire entry-level.

Everyone I know in the field has come into it laterally either from a prior software or hardware job in an unrelated field.

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#12
post #3

Relevant article: Scanning the Body with Sound https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/scanning-the-body-with-so...

Pictures are surely what everyone wants to see, thanks. Animation that looks similar below. I’m not sure its that similar to MRI, but there are clear advantages to using US and it’s a new technique which hopefully get better. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-04-body-ultrasound-captu...

[deleted]

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#14
This is cool! I've got a personal project in the works to build an ultrasound machine just to learn how it works. There's a lot of electronics design, PCB design, FPGA work etc that in learning. The probes themselves are used medical grade ones from ebay.

The hard part is that there can be over hundreds of piezo elements each needing to receive on their own channel. That means lots of expensive ADCs. Not to mention either having many pulser circuits or muxing a pulser to many elements.

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#15

This is cool! I've got a personal project in the works to build an ultrasound machine just to learn how it works. There's a lot of electronics design, PCB design, FPGA work etc that in learning. The probes themselves are used medical grade ones from ebay. The hard part is that there can be over hundreds of piezo elements each needing to receive on their own channel. That means lots of expensive ADCs. Not to mention e…

Have a look at this open source ultrasound project for some inspiration! https://un0rick.cc/

Also my personal project which was inspired by un0rick but a bit simpler: https://williammeng.com/rtl-ultrasound.html

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#16

I really wanted to make a career in tomography. But had only one elective from another department and didn't know how to make it into this stream.

It’s difficult. Medical devices are not easy for a small business to break into and the big manufacturers don’t typically hire entry-level. Everyone I know in the field has come into it laterally either from a prior software or hardware job in an unrelated field.

Tomography: Come today, join tomorrow.

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#17

The results really look rather blurry compared to the MRI... Presumably that's just a matter of better system modelling to fix?

MRI is done using X rays which have very very small wavelength compared to sound. And resolution of images i.e. less blurry varies inversely proportional to the wavelength. Yes some algo can make slightly better but I am certain that nothing can beat x rays in clarity for humans

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#18

The results really look rather blurry compared to the MRI... Presumably that's just a matter of better system modelling to fix?

MRI is done using X rays which have very very small wavelength compared to sound. And resolution of images i.e. less blurry varies inversely proportional to the wavelength. Yes some algo can make slightly better but I am certain that nothing can beat x rays in clarity for humans

No X rays are involved in MRI.

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#19

The results really look rather blurry compared to the MRI... Presumably that's just a matter of better system modelling to fix?

MRI is done using X rays which have very very small wavelength compared to sound. And resolution of images i.e. less blurry varies inversely proportional to the wavelength. Yes some algo can make slightly better but I am certain that nothing can beat x rays in clarity for humans

MRI uses RF wavelengths, which are measured in meters. Ultrasound waves are measured in fractions of a millimeter. Wavelength is not the relevant factor here.

Re: Whole cross-sectional human ultrasound tomography

#20

The results really look rather blurry compared to the MRI... Presumably that's just a matter of better system modelling to fix?

MRI is done using X rays which have very very small wavelength compared to sound. And resolution of images i.e. less blurry varies inversely proportional to the wavelength. Yes some algo can make slightly better but I am certain that nothing can beat x rays in clarity for humans

You are thinking of CT scans. MRIs use strong magnetic fields and MHz-range radio waves.
Post reply on HN