The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
textexpander.com
The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#2This isn’t clever, it’s just annoying.
Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#3Jcenters, whoever you are, kill this awful website. It reflows the width on scroll, the top bar occupies 1/5 of my phone, nobody wants whatever the fucking AI expanded blog slop you are selling. This isn’t clever, it’s just annoying.
Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#4Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#5Jcenters, whoever you are, kill this awful website. It reflows the width on scroll, the top bar occupies 1/5 of my phone, nobody wants whatever the fucking AI expanded blog slop you are selling. This isn’t clever, it’s just annoying.
Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#6Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#7Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#8This is just a hacky way of doing the same thing, all on your own, and a tremendously silly way to do it. Which makes sense because this is literally just an ad.
Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#9Things have changed since I last watched it. I much preferred the Daleks.
Re: The Doctor Who Treats Patients with a Gaming Mouse
#10Aside from the website being annoying, the story is horrific, a doctor speed running patient interactions with pre canned snippets. Disgusting.
These solutions are symptoms of a broken system. I would not judge the people working within the system for using these solutions (edit: unless someone's quality is exceptionally bad like academic fraudsters as a academics work in a similar metrics-driven environment). Management (and politicians in the case of the USPTO) created the incentives that are the real problem.
Automation like this can be useful to enhance quality, but in my experience at the USPTO, there was a lot of automation they could have used to enhance quality, but they didn't. The incentives to improve speed are far stronger than the incentives to improve quality.