Live data from Hacker News

AI Engineer Claims to Have Cracked Linear A

aiclambake.com

11–20 of 195 posts

Re: AI Engineer Claims to Have Cracked Linear A

#12
post #10
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then why is there no link to the actual write-up?

It seems this is still extremely early in the process. There is an apparent finding that was shared. Evidence which would be the basis for a paper is "being reviewed by linguistics experts at Rutgers and Cambridge". So they are trying to do the right thing by talking about what they believe they have done but holding off publication and serious claims until later. The general idea that written forms can be categorize…

> The general idea that written forms can be categorized by systems built with Claude could be applied to other as yet undecipherable languages could be used by other interested investigators just with what is discussed here.

Could you rephrase this or explain it more thoroughly? I don’t follow. What does it mean to categorize a written form by systems built with Claude?

Re: AI Engineer Claims to Have Cracked Linear A

#13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can use Claude, like the author, to reproduce the result.

Unless if it was done by Fable!

The 'major insight' described in the article predates Fable's release by two week four days. It would be a complicated timeline.

Re: AI Engineer Claims to Have Cracked Linear A

#15
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Then why is there no link to the actual write-up?

You can use Claude, like the author, to reproduce the result.

This isn't really a reasonable approach, is it?

The original prompts aren't provided, nor is the original context; even then, you can't really treat a stochastic system like an LLM as a major component in reproducibility.

Re: AI Engineer Claims to Have Cracked Linear A

#16
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems this is still extremely early in the process. There is an apparent finding that was shared. Evidence which would be the basis for a paper is "being reviewed by linguistics experts at Rutgers and Cambridge". So they are trying to do the right thing by talking about what they believe they have done but holding off publication and serious claims until later. The general idea that written forms can be categorize…

> The general idea that written forms can be categorized by systems built with Claude could be applied to other as yet undecipherable languages could be used by other interested investigators just with what is discussed here. Could you rephrase this or explain it more thoroughly? I don’t follow. What does it mean to categorize a written form by systems built with Claude?

The same pattern/tech is generic enough that it might be able to solve other unrelated, and so-far undecipherable, written languages.

Re: AI Engineer Claims to Have Cracked Linear A

#17

A lot of loonies make this claim, but Tom's work is credible enough that it's being reviewed by linguistics experts at Rutgers and Cambridge. Additional validation: his approach produces results. He's translated over 300 words, and that's never been done before, and his solution actually solves some problems in Linear B. Tom is an AI engineer, and Claude Code was key to his work. Disclosures: I know Tom socially, and…

[deleted]

Re: AI Engineer Claims to Have Cracked Linear A

#19
post #8

A lot of loonies make this claim, but Tom's work is credible enough that it's being reviewed by linguistics experts at Rutgers and Cambridge. Additional validation: his approach produces results. He's translated over 300 words, and that's never been done before, and his solution actually solves some problems in Linear B. Tom is an AI engineer, and Claude Code was key to his work. Disclosures: I know Tom socially, and…

Let's wait until it's been verified.

You're absolutely right! We've opened a ticket with the Linear A folks, hopefully they'll get back to us soon with an update as to whether we've got it correct or not. Hang tight!
Post reply on HN