Live data from Hacker News

Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

twitter.com

151–160 of 478 posts

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#151
post #45

https://old.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1u8xc9m/most_l... Seems like there are some insights here! edit: it seems the post has been removed but comments are viewable. 1 liner summary: To put it lightly, the dude was politically outspoken and held strong beliefs.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#154

For those interested, Wired ran a backstory about the Attention is All You Need paper 2 years ago: https://www.wired.com/story/eight-google-employees-invented-... It gives some context on the contributions of each of the authors. About Shazeer, from the article: Shazeer’s joining the group was critical. “These theoretical or intuitive mechanisms, like self-attention, always require very careful implementation, often…

> Using what team members would later describe with words like “magic” and “alchemy” and “bells and whistles,”

Ok, these peopl have all gotten extensive training on how to hype for the non-technical crowd without saying anything of substance.

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#155
post #76
post #48

Some context for people who haven’t followed the full loop: Shazeer was a long-time Google researcher, joined Google in 2000, and was one of the co-authors of “Attention Is All You Need.” He left Google in 2021 to co-found Character.AI. In 2024, Google brought him and some Character.AI researchers back via a licensing/talent deal with Character.AI (reportedly around $2.7B). He was then made a Gemini co-lead. Now he’s…

this character.ai? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce3xgwyywe4o

[flagged]

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

the g-slur? I won't say it in case it is a slur, is that the word the jews call non-jews?

That makes way more sense, I thought he meant gypsy. In either case he should just say the word, this site isn't for children.

Avicebron is correct. I avoided being specific because I didn't want to derail the thread with responses from people that fulminate over specific keywords.

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#157
post #111
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

what's the context behind this?

The context is AI made some knowledge work less cushy so now some folks are trying to point out random imaginary flaws (e.g TP or "water usage") when they're not busy trying to convince everyone AI doesn't work.

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#158
post #103

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Companies are not your friend who you need to be loyal to. There's a reason noncompetes are illegal in California.

Think of it like if this: Novo Nordisk hired you to find a cure for obesity. - This is your full time job, and this is what you are paid for. The company also invests in a lab, in machines, in other employees, etc, so all of you together can figure out. You find Wegovy, and poof, you run away with the recipe and sell the product on your own. - Yes, you just scammed your boss, you made him believe that you were workin…

You do realize Google received a patent on the transformer right?

Re: Noam Shazeer Joins OpenAI

#160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If he is supposedly extremely smart, then surely he would have known what he was doing. So how can anyone claim all this was just an accident? "Google and Character.AI agree to settle lawsuits over teen suicides" - https://www.axios.com/2026/01/07/google-character-ai-lawsuit... Be aware...very disturbing: https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/e2e8fc50-a9ac...

Is this genuinely confusing for people? He helped invent the transformer, he didn’t solve content moderation.

he didn’t solve content moderation.

Considering what character.ai is, maybe he should have at least taken a shot at it.

Post reply on HN