Live data from Hacker News

Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache

vinyl-cache.org

1–10 of 45 posts

Re: Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache

#2
The comparison with MySQL/MariaDB is unfortunate, given that since the "split" MariaDB has shown itself to be every bit the corporate owned "FOSS" project while its supporters still harp on about how terrible oracle is for OSS, without actually acknowledging the real history of each respective project and accompanying company.

Given that MariaDB the company is now owned by a private equity firm, I doubt it's going to get better.

Re: Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache

#3
The operational wrinkle nobody mentions in the rename is that the same vulnerability now ships under two version trains. VSV00019 was just patched as Vinyl 9.0.1 and as Varnish 8.0.2 and 6.0.18, so anyone pinning a version in their package manager has to figure out which lineage their distro actually tracks before the next CVE lands.

Re: Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache

#4
post #2

The comparison with MySQL/MariaDB is unfortunate, given that since the "split" MariaDB has shown itself to be every bit the corporate owned "FOSS" project while its supporters still harp on about how terrible oracle is for OSS, without actually acknowledging the real history of each respective project and accompanying company. Given that MariaDB the company is now owned by a private equity firm, I doubt it's going to…

Still got Percona, but I'm not sure what their status is at the moment.

Re: Vinyl Cache and Varnish Cache

#5
This article links to a previous one[0] (by Poul) which states:

> I will also state for the record, that there are no hard feelings between Varnish Software and the FOSS project.

I wonder if that is still the case now. (this article is fairly diplomatically written, but I'd imagine it must be pretty frustrating)

[0] https://vinyl-cache.org/organization/20-years.html#years

Post reply on HN