Nearly 40 trillion rollers in debt.
Make that $40.3 trillions.
U.S. science is in chaos
541–550 of 1001 posts
Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#542Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#543I work at a research lab that was previously supported by an R01 grant that did not get renewed last year. It’s been tough and the staff (including me) have been moved to part-time employment. However, it also made us put ourselves out there and fundraise, which led to new connections and new opportunities. So yes, it’s been chaotic, but like Petyr Baelish says, chaos is a ladder.
Petyr Baelish got stabbed to death while on his ladder, I don’t think that’s a good analogy
Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#544Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Conservatives have been basically purged from academia over the last 30 years, Any citations on this?
Sure https://www.aei.org/articles/partisan-professors/ I'd be shocked to find anyone surprised by this.
Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#545Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't see that happening. The US debt will hinder any big expense that could keep it in any game long term. Take AI for instance. The US grid is struggling to keep up with demand, while Chinese one has a lot of headway [1]. Usually, this could be solved by an increase in spending lasting a few years which would make the debt tick up, but that would've been an absolutely fine use of debt since it buys some shiny new…
> Take AI for instance. The US grid is struggling to keep up with demand, while Chinese one has a lot of headway [1]. Usually, this could be solved by an increase in spending lasting a few years which would make the debt tick up, but that would've been an absolutely fine use of debt since it buys some shiny new infra that will pay dividends for the next 20ish years. I object. The CCP is much more deeply indebted than…
I never seen that metric used anywhere else aside China
Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#546Earlier quoted context omitted.
The better question is: Why is it that when republicans hear the word "racism" they immediately think people are talking about them? Are they afraid of what research on racism will show?
No that's a more partisan one, and is exactly the sort of thing OP was arguing against. If you want broad based support for research funding you will necessarily need support from a lot of people you personally find distasteful. You can either try to appeal to people across the spectrum and keep bipartisan support, or label half the country racist and deal with the resulting backlash. As someone who hates the current…
This is an unfair characterization, and frankly, is baseless political rhetoric. Incredible propaganda job moneyed interests have performed in order to convince the right wing that any research that asks probing questions about equity automatically implies anyone white and conservative is “racist”.
My favorite research that falls into this category concerns the effects of nuclear weapons testing on the lands and livelihoods of indigenous peoples. Clearly, nakedly something that anyone with a decent moral compass would give a shit about, but pulled under the umbrella of DEI because empathy is dead.
Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#547Where do you go if you’re looking to leave the US with family and you only speak English?
Edit: Interesting how controversial my take seems to be. I’ve seen votes on this post go up and down multiple times. Why only vote? Reply!
Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#548Where do you go if you’re looking to leave the US with family and you only speak English?
Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#549Re: U.S. science is in chaos
#550> But arbitrary cancellations and delayed disbursements are unprecedented. And justifying them on the basis of politics—prohibiting, for instance, grants that include language referencing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)—was unheard of until now. It is odd how removal of DEI is framed as being political, when it is the other way round. DEI schemes were deeply political, and depended on who can claim to be the bi…
I don't think requiring prospective hires to write a DEI statement is equally as political as illegally cancelling already funded and approved research into e.g. racial disparities in maternal mortality, or health equity gaps for rural Americans (yes, it's DEI even if it's for predominantly white people).