The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
1–10 of 131 posts
Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#2Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#3Being on the other side of the AI machine changes the perspective of whether it is dangerous or not, I guess.
Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#4"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it."
You've never heard such strong one-sided cope until you've talked to an NVDA employee about AI. I'm not even against AI. It's just that a combination of intense financial incentives around a product that provides a good simulation of the Chinese Room has really fucked peoples brains up.
Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#5Now they need to convince the government that they didn't mean anything of the previous things they claimed.
Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#6Many such cases, he was just hungry.
Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#7Being on the other side of the AI machine changes the perspective of whether it is dangerous or not, I guess.
Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#8These are the consequences of fear mongering as hard as they did. You reap what you sow. Now they need to convince the government that they didn't mean anything of the previous things they claimed.
This isn't 100% Anthropic's fault, although I'm sure that's part of it. This is the current corrupt administration executing on a grudge they have against Anthropic, and the government's new found love of picking winners and losers.
Re: The hacker sent by Anthropic to calm the government's nerves about AI safety
#9You can’t jump up and down screaming how amazing, powerful, and dangerous your new tech is and then act surprised and annoyed when the government shows up looking to regulate it.
Their new argument now seems be that this was marketing hype/fluff that backfired, in a pretty obvious and predicable way, and now they’re trying to reset the conversation.