Live data from Hacker News

GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

artificialanalysis.ai

21–30 of 476 posts

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#21
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I’m not that interested in models that I can’t run on my desktop for ~0€, which is my AI budget.

Cool beans. You're not the target audience then.

Did I claim I was? I just said why I and people like me are not talking about it.

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#22
> On the Intelligence vs. Cost per Task Pareto Frontier: GLM-5.2 is on the Pareto frontier of the Intelligence vs Cost per Task chart, with the lowest cost per task among models at its intelligence level. GLM-5.2 costs ~$0.46 per task, compared to GLM-5.1 ($0.25), Kimi K2.6 ($0.31), MiniMax-M3 ($0.18) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (max, $0.05)

am i missing something?

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#23
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is GLM 5.2 Max. GLM 5.2 High which use less than half[1] the tokens. [1] https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.2

Yes, but the Artificial Analysis result is also from GLM 5.2 (max), not high.

They have this with a lot of models, measuring only the max setting, while the one you'd actually want to use for most tasks is much lower.

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#25
post #4

Why aren't more people talking about this? It's literally Opus 4.7 quality stupid prices. I know providers who are offering this at unlimited tokens for $50 a month. Some are even offering API rates at 3x lower than the official ZAI api rates which are already like 10x cheaper than Opus. (Crof and Umans btw) This is a huge blow to Anthropic/OpenAI/Google and a massive win for the rest of the world. The official API p…

In my org everyone is extremely Claude-pilled to the point you’d think it’s the only LLM that exists, purely because it caters to non-engineers within enterprises.

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#26
post #4

Why aren't more people talking about this? It's literally Opus 4.7 quality stupid prices. I know providers who are offering this at unlimited tokens for $50 a month. Some are even offering API rates at 3x lower than the official ZAI api rates which are already like 10x cheaper than Opus. (Crof and Umans btw) This is a huge blow to Anthropic/OpenAI/Google and a massive win for the rest of the world. The official API p…

> Some are even offering API rates at 3x lower than the official ZAI api rates

Looking at openrouter [1], some of the cheaper offerings are for quantized models. Not sure how much intelligence is lost in quantization. And they are not 3 times cheaper. Where did you find 3x lower prices for APIs? I am considering skipping open router and using them directly for that price.

edit:

I see, croft [2] 8bit for $0.50/$0.08/$2.20

[1]: https://openrouter.ai/z-ai/glm-5.2

[2]: https://ai.nahcrof.com/pricing

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#27

I've been playing with this model a fair amount over the last 24 hours, and I can confirm it's quite capable, while being a little bit verbose (I've seen it reconsider things 3-4 times in thinking traces before deciding on a path forward), and not being quite as good as GPT5.5 at working through complex abstract requirements. Honestly it's good enough that I feel comfortable recommending a Z.AI sub + a $20/mo OpenAI…

This is my workflow. And then once a day I copy paste the code into the free Claude Sonnet so it comes out actually readable.

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#28
post #4

Why aren't more people talking about this? It's literally Opus 4.7 quality stupid prices. I know providers who are offering this at unlimited tokens for $50 a month. Some are even offering API rates at 3x lower than the official ZAI api rates which are already like 10x cheaper than Opus. (Crof and Umans btw) This is a huge blow to Anthropic/OpenAI/Google and a massive win for the rest of the world. The official API p…

Be careful about unofficial providers, a lot of them misconfigure models or stealth quantize them. For a while the difference between Kimi on the official API and most third party providers was 20-40%.

OpenRouter should be penalising or banning for this.

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#29
post #2

It seems to really be a nice step-up and is getting quite close to the frontier. I wish they'd start focusing on the reasoning efficiency now, though. I have a simple (relatively) test task to evaluate LLMs: writing a simple math evaluator library in Nim (it's about 400-600 lines total max), and GLM 5.2 (xhigh which maps to max effort) spent over 15 minutes (!) reasoning, spending about 45k tokens, before it finally…

This is a problem I find with opus is will spend so long thinking then going “but wait what if”

To point where I stop it and simple tell it to “start writing code you can work it out as you go along”

Seems writers block also effects LLM

Re: GLM-5.2 is the new leading open weights model on Artificial Analysis

#30
post #2

It seems to really be a nice step-up and is getting quite close to the frontier. I wish they'd start focusing on the reasoning efficiency now, though. I have a simple (relatively) test task to evaluate LLMs: writing a simple math evaluator library in Nim (it's about 400-600 lines total max), and GLM 5.2 (xhigh which maps to max effort) spent over 15 minutes (!) reasoning, spending about 45k tokens, before it finally…

[deleted]
Post reply on HN