Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

mll.sh

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

61–70 of 106 posts

Re: Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

#61

Post by shantnutiwari »

xeyownt wrote: post #55
merpkz wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"This is the brute-force fallback when the smart approaches fail, and honestly, it works more often than you’d expect." Found the LLM generated part.

[flagged]

"... can we stop this stupid trend to flag everything as LLM generated?"

I have trying to fight this war and lose-- this default lazy behaviour "I dont like this post so it must be llm" followed by some idiotic example

Its become a fad here. Half the people dont read any post, just skim it and post "this is llm" and move on

Re: Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

#62

Post by Tiberium »

xeyownt wrote: post #55
merpkz wrote: post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"This is the brute-force fallback when the smart approaches fail, and honestly, it works more often than you’d expect." Found the LLM generated part.

[flagged]

Why is it stupid to flag genuinely LLM-written content? It might've been thought out by a human, but the final version is clearly LLM-written or extremely heavily LLM-edited.

Re: Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

#63

Post by amenghra »

stavros wrote: post #47
bitwize wrote: post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Guys, guys, guys, listen, listen, listen. So I'm in this computer, right? So I'm lookin' around, lookin' around, throwing commands at it, I don't know where it is or what it does or anything..."

Where's that from?

It's from Hackers: https://www.scifiscripts.com/scripts/hackers.txt#:~:text=Any...

Re: Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

#64

Post by andai »

helloplanets wrote: post #46
andai wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Several times, I wondered if Claude wrote it.

Would be a feat on its own to get Claude to write on a topic like this.

I do think there was a lot of human effort involved. The llm-isms (whether human or machine generated!) cheapen the whole thing, which is a shame.

I rather read bad awkward human writing than LLM generated paragraph number 9 billion.

Re: Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

#65

Post by fragmede »

wil421 wrote: post #21
naturalmovement wrote: post #2

I front all my honeypots with the IIS landing page precisely because it attracts black hat jagoffs. Nothing makes me happier than knowing I've wasted hours of their time chasing their own tails.

Tell me more…I opened a plex and Nintendo switch port, the scans were out of control. I’d love to screw over port scanner over.

What does shodan.io run?

Re: Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

#69

Post by gpvos »

Tiberium wrote: post #62
xeyownt wrote: post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

Why is it stupid to flag genuinely LLM-written content? It might've been thought out by a human, but the final version is clearly LLM-written or extremely heavily LLM-edited.

It's mostly boring. About 50% of comments of HN are about this at the moment, drowning out actual discussion.

If someone writes an interesting article using LLM, I don't mind.

Re: Humiliating IIS servers for fun and jail time

#70

Post by raverbashing »

naturalmovement wrote: post #2

I front all my honeypots with the IIS landing page precisely because it attracts black hat jagoffs. Nothing makes me happier than knowing I've wasted hours of their time chasing their own tails.

Sounds like creating an url like aspnet_client/admin.php returning a WebObjects header might be a good hobby
Post reply on HN