Ugh, what violation of local law can't be excused by specious "national security" claims? > resulting in a corresponding increase in three major air pollutants: Sometimes I wonder how valuable it would be to go to vulnerable areas (ecologically or socio-economically) and record baseline pollution, noise, etc. readings, simply to give future residents some statistical ammunition against some New Thing ruins the old im…
> what violation of local law can't be excused by specious "national security" claims? None. If this continues, the economy pivots to profits to the President.
DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
41–50 of 90 posts
Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
>The company, which is now a division of SpaceX, is likely to buy more generators in the coming months or years. In SpaceX’s IPO filing, the company said that it will buy another $2.8 billion worth of gas turbines to power its AI data centers over the next three years. Of that, at least $2 billion are earmarked for “mobile gas turbines.” SpaceX, the new Tesla... who saw that coming? :(
Timnit Gebru was laughed out of town for overlooking research into making LLMs more energy efficient. By the logic used to drag her through the mud, Musk must be a total idiot to be buying so much fossil fuel capacity. Truly, nobody could see this coming. Must be 5d chess.
Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#43Sorry, Brit here, I'm confused. Why is the plaintiff here the NAACP?
Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#44Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#45Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not breaking the law as xAI are using mobile generators.
"Mobile" generators that are sitting in one place and not moving.
Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#47And Paul Graham wants us to believe you don’t become a billionaire by cheating.
Epstein files highlight that once you achieve intergenerational wealth there is a natural tendency to make your children legally immune so that your wealth can't be stolen. It's not only about achieving a diplomatic passport from some small nation as honorary consul in order to avoid a parking fee, but about placing your offspring in positions at five eyes intelligence agencies which makes them legally immune and gives them access to fake identities.
During cold war there was a national security need for extra-congressional operations in foreign countries and off-the-record budgets, which had to be managed by "someone" on a need-to-know basis.
My research indicates that many of the billionaires we see today are five eyes nepo kids. Their grandparents did great things for the country during WW2/cold war, many of them were researchers in national security context (Maxwell in electronics, Epstein in electronics/medicine/psychiatry, (van) Trump in radiology/agriculture/pathogens).
My theory is that their work for five-eyes intelligence ties together the now-famous family names such as Maxwell, Epstein, (van) Trump, Thiel, Jarecki, Sweeney, Ellison, Lawrence, Graham, Fox, King, Richardson, and many others, as they pop up together in primary sources in the national security context since at least WW2.
There is a reason why middle names such as "Baron" or "Earl" or "Don" (Spanish for lord) keep showing up. Many come from old-money aristocracy with the ability to change IDs at will.
For example Donald Trump is on the record to have (ab)used fake identities throughout his career, and some primary sources indicate that he used further identities that have not been publicly reported on such as "Donald Epstein" - a name that pops up together with Kashoggi. Also Maxwell and Epstein are documented in the files to have used fake identities.
So the whole thought process about "morals" or "stealing" is wasted time, the King and his Lords and Knights can do whatever they want and nobody can stop them.
The only thing that has changed is that for 50 years we all believed into the "American Dream" and the rags-to-riches fake stories, when in fact the aristocracy never left, kept their wealth offshore, and can make their kids pop up at will at the top of any industry of their choice.
Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#48Re: DOJ claims xAI's gas turbines are a matter of 'national and energy security'
#49Sorry, Brit here, I'm confused. Why is the plaintiff here the NAACP?
Because tribalism. NAACP is lefty, and Musk is righty. So they fight.