Live data from Hacker News

GLM-5.2: Frontier Intelligence, Open Weights

twitter.com

1–10 of 20 posts

Re: GLM-5.2: Frontier Intelligence, Open Weights

#5
Given that DeepSwe is one of the very few coding benchmarks worth taking a look at, this achieves rather excellent result at it (not far from opus 4.8).

From looking at the results and my own impression of 5.1 and other models, I think this is the best Chinese coding model by some non-insignificant margin.

Re: GLM-5.2: Frontier Intelligence, Open Weights

#6
post #5

Given that DeepSwe is one of the very few coding benchmarks worth taking a look at, this achieves rather excellent result at it (not far from opus 4.8). From looking at the results and my own impression of 5.1 and other models, I think this is the best Chinese coding model by some non-insignificant margin.

I've been very pleased with it's performance over the last few days.

It's definitely not near Opus 4.8 level but it's very impressive nonetheless and it does do design extremely well.

Re: GLM-5.2: Frontier Intelligence, Open Weights

#7
post #5

Given that DeepSwe is one of the very few coding benchmarks worth taking a look at, this achieves rather excellent result at it (not far from opus 4.8). From looking at the results and my own impression of 5.1 and other models, I think this is the best Chinese coding model by some non-insignificant margin.

I've been very pleased with it's performance over the last few days. It's definitely not near Opus 4.8 level but it's very impressive nonetheless and it does do design extremely well.

> it does do design extremely well

Better than Opus?

Re: GLM-5.2: Frontier Intelligence, Open Weights

#8
post #3

If I have a fully maxed out MacBook Pro, would it make sense to just switch from Opus 4.8 to this? I've never tried running local models for coding...

HuggingFace says this model has 753B parameters, which will need a lot more RAM than a maxed-out MacBook Pro. With 40B active parameters, running from SSD would need patience.

Re: GLM-5.2: Frontier Intelligence, Open Weights

#9
post #8
post #3

If I have a fully maxed out MacBook Pro, would it make sense to just switch from Opus 4.8 to this? I've never tried running local models for coding...

HuggingFace says this model has 753B parameters, which will need a lot more RAM than a maxed-out MacBook Pro. With 40B active parameters, running from SSD would need patience.

I’ve wondered for a while if anyone is working on very wide channel parallel (kind of like RAID 0) SSD for this purpose. Couple that with a tensor processor and that would be interesting.
Post reply on HN