Live data from Hacker News

Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

newsletter.pragmaticengineer.com

331–340 of 655 posts

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#331
post #4

> 30-50% of engineers on core teams have been forcefully reassigned to data labeling and RLHF, upsetting folks even more. This really doesn't sound believable to me, but who knows with all the craziness going on. Software developers in the US are seriously expensive, using them for data labeling would be a waste of resources. And the percentage sounds very high, unless "core teams" is only a small subset of the total…

My partner works there as an engineer. The org they work in had loads of people transferred to the "AAI" org doing data labelling. I find it almost unbelievable as well, but it is true.

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#332
I live in $MAJOR_CITY, and Meta is a not a viable workplace for serious engineers anymore.

The short term pay for the lunacy of working there is not a sensible trade-off for decent engineers.

Aside from having the sword of Damocles over you at all times because Zuck has lost his mind, there is a sense he has had 1 too many failures after Metaverse and they are seriously floundering in AI, and their core products (Ad Manager) has a very poor image, even with non-technical users.

So it's not even a sure bet you will even get a short term monetary payoff

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#333

I think the gloating in this thread is very misguided. Meta is evil, sure, but that's not the point. The point is that this kind of AI psychosis might be the new normal for our industry, or at least one of the new normals. My last workplace absolutely did a jump in toxicity when the CEO got obsessed with AI, instituted token leaderboards, told us all to drop all non-AI work for a time, etc. We were no Meta.

> this kind of AI psychosis might be the new normal for our industry, or at least one of the new normals That's possible, but don't underestimate the cleansing power of a huge market crash. I don't know how it'll shake out, nobody does, but I'd bet in a few years hardly anyone will be looking back on the gung-ho AI thoughtleadering of 2026 as anything other than a stain on history.

IDK, I think overall it will be more like the 'SAAS' and 'Low Code' waves than the 'Blockchain' fever dreams I've heard in my career.

Something that can be useful but being over-reliant on especially at a management level, could be disastrous.

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#335
post #139

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the Meta engineering organization created PyTorch and React People created PyTorch and React, they happen to be working at Meta at the time. Maybe it's unlikely they'd create those working elsewhere, but I think it's much more unlikely that someone else at Meta would have created the same thing without those people there.

Totally agree. And who cares, the internet, computers and web apps worked before and will work after those go away. It's not like React is some irreplaceable genius invention, it's just a framework like Ember, Angular, etc etc. The people who made them are no doubt amazing, but what I'm saying is we're not "in debt" to Meta for these tools at all.

Meta assigned hundreds of engineers to work PyTorch. That is only going to happen at a handful of companies. You are very much in debt to Meta if you use it.

"We’ve committed hundreds of engineers to the framework ..." https://ai.meta.com/blog/pytorch-foundation/

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#336

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You'd say that Google Maps hasn't improved much in the last 20 years?

It’s doing a great job making sure I know where Burger King is when zooming into a city

Interesting submission on that topic : How Google Maps allocates survival across London's restaurants https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46203343

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#338

Having worked at meta, something I noticed is that the orgs that were well run were ones that were bought. WhatsApp, reality, insta, etc. I worked in an org that was not associated with those products and was purely homegrown and it was awful. Things got done but horribly inefficiently due to over hiring and extreme requirement and schedule shifts. I believe that the cultures that were developed outside of Meta are u…

that may have been true in product orgs but the infra and dev infra orgs were pretty strong imho.

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#339

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you get a FAANG job you need to think like a professional athlete. S This is what Netflix has always been advocating for. Reid Hoffman also wrote the book The Alliance, in which he argues that employees and employers are allies. When they are aligned, they work together. When not, they part ways. I find that these two views are realistic and we can use them to guide our actions.

> This is what Netflix has always been advocating for. Reid Hoffman also wrote the book The Alliance I think you might have Reid Hoffman (founder of LinkedIn) mixed up with Reed Hastings (founder of Netflix). :)

My bad. I was talking about both. The Netflix culture, and the book written by Hoffman. Hopefully I spelled their names right.

Re: Is Meta destroying its engineering organization?

#340
> Needless to say, this is invasive and raises privacy questions: If you log into your personal bank account, does the tool track you? What about when you’re writing a personal email, or responding to a personal call? Meta held no consultation and there are no workarounds; just a top-down decision being pushed through.

I'm not going to defend Meta's recent practices but any expectation of privacy when using an employer's device is forfeit. I thought this was basic common sense?

Post reply on HN