21–30 of 50 posts
>Every important computing platform has been defined by what people built with it. The PC became meaningful because developers built software. The web became meaningful because developers built websites. Smartphones became meaningful because developers built apps. We believe augmented reality will be no different. At a $2195 price point, it just won't be possible to have an ecosystem. All the other platforms mentione…
>Every important computing platform has been defined by what people built with it. The PC became meaningful because developers built software. The web became meaningful because developers built websites. Smartphones became meaningful because developers built apps. We believe augmented reality will be no different. At a $2195 price point, it just won't be possible to have an ecosystem. All the other platforms mentione…
Early PCs were VERY expensive at the time.
This but cut out a hole for the camera and https://www.skmproducts.com/product/original-tv-hat/ :^)
See? It's possible to support older tech
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think they're all trying to be a phone replacement, when I need them to be a smart watch replacement. Give me smart glasses and a ring that controls them. Give me simple, watch like actions, notifications, but keep them out of view.
They all want a new platform and lucrative app store, but glasses should be an accessory, like a smart watch as you noted. However, smart watches don't have lucrative app stores, so we get chonky, dorky looking faceware like this.
>Every important computing platform has been defined by what people built with it. The PC became meaningful because developers built software. The web became meaningful because developers built websites. Smartphones became meaningful because developers built apps. We believe augmented reality will be no different. At a $2195 price point, it just won't be possible to have an ecosystem. All the other platforms mentione…
Early PCs were VERY expensive at the time.
I think they're chasing the wrong dream. Most of the use cases they're proposing won't suffer much from being attached to a battery/processing puck, and in some cases being attached to a laptop. e.g. I'm not watching a movie while walking down the sidewalk. It would be nice to just sit on a comfy sofa someplace my laptop isn't and watch a movie, but not pay-an-extra-$1800 nice. especially when there are similar devic…
If you want both, you pay for both. If you only want movie watching, something like the XREALs will suit you better. If you want notifications in your face while your phone's in your pocket, and you want to watch that video while standing in line, then this is for you.
>Every important computing platform has been defined by what people built with it. The PC became meaningful because developers built software. The web became meaningful because developers built websites. Smartphones became meaningful because developers built apps. We believe augmented reality will be no different. At a $2195 price point, it just won't be possible to have an ecosystem. All the other platforms mentione…
Early PCs were VERY expensive at the time.
>Every important computing platform has been defined by what people built with it. The PC became meaningful because developers built software. The web became meaningful because developers built websites. Smartphones became meaningful because developers built apps. We believe augmented reality will be no different. At a $2195 price point, it just won't be possible to have an ecosystem. All the other platforms mentione…
Early PCs were VERY expensive at the time.
It's been considered by all measures a flop. (I have one and love it).
Snapchat has a 2nd rate social media platform after a new audience, they already failed with hardware once, they lost all momentrum relative to their geo spatial ad filters and Lens make app (blew up during COVID).
I dont know convinces anyone that they are due for an Apple like moment in AR at $2k+ per glasses.
This is why VCs/PEs tend to not like founders.