Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yea there's something called a phone book too.
And that would be a much better source for a phone number than Googling. Similarly, the docs that ship with software are a better source for command line switches for that software than a search engine or LLM.
Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
471–480 of 620 posts
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#472I do think we are slowly getting Gemma 4 was a big jump
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#473Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hopefully this isn't off-topic, but your setup sounds just like mine, Strix Halo and (I'm assuming) llama.cpp on ROCm, and I'm finding that the Qwen hybrid models don't handle prompt caching and instead re-process the context in full on every turn. I'm wondering if you were able to solve this and how?
What harness are you using? Some of them (e.g. OpenCode) mutate the system prompt every turn, and therefore can't work with a KV cache. I've had the best luck with Pi so far, but it comes without some bells and whistles you might be used to (e.g. plan mode, subagents, MCP client support)
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#474Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#475Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#476I have! I care about data privacy and LLMs being free. I'm using the Pi coding harness but containerized and sandboxed, to make sure it's running completely offline. On my Mac Studio with 128GB RAM (or MacBook with 36GB RAM) I'm using Qwen3.6 35b, with only 3b active parameters so that it runs really fast. I've done a complete redesign for my website's homepage and blog with Django + Wagtail. The latter is interestin…
You are paying for the extra power draw.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#477These models are still very capable with good hardware, but they do lack the deep reasoning of major models and require more precise prompting.
So unless you really need the privacy, or have a lot of excess cash, it is not recommended, as considering the price of major models, it's just extremely cost inefficient!
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#478I don't think you're going to get many "true" answers to this. The opportunity cost of not using the latest and best models is just too much right now. Every month I research this and come to the same conclusion: the time, effort, and cost required to get local models (and the coding tools around them) to perform even close to Claude Code with sonnet/opus just not worth it right now. If it was, it would be distributi…
Claude Code is not Claude Opus/Sonnet/Haiku.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#479Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#480Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't you read through all the output of the agent before committing them?
That's not the way how human brain works.