Earlier quoted context omitted.
2x RTX3090 are around $4400. Without any electricity costs or other parts, that's 3.6 years of $100/m claude.
That's also years of top tier PC gaming, if you're into that.
Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
141–150 of 620 posts
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#142Models that you can run at home (Like Qwen 35B) aren't remotely close to Opus or GPT 5.5. Not even close. The only open models that are in that neighbor are around 1T params, so forget about running at home. It's kind of like driving a shitbox. It can often drive you from A to B, and some people will try to convince you it's fine. It's not. There's no logical reason other than absolutely requiring the privacy, doing…
> Models that you can run at home (Like Qwen 35B) aren't remotely close to Opus or GPT 5.5. Is that characterization based on some objective facts or benchmarks?
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#143The hardware I have (32gb Macs and a gaming PC with 10gb 3080) can only get me to Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at various quants but that’s enough (200-400 PP, 20-30 TG).
It’s taken some time to learn how to best utilize it - some things take a bit of babysitting or direction - but it’s quite useful. Not having ever used CC I can’t compare but it’s been a great assistant or pair programmer for everything from embedded C++ to Vue. I wish I could run 27B as there have been moments when this model feels like it just can’t quite figure something out but those moments are quite rare. For a lot of tasks it’s a huge time saver and has proved super capable at digging into and fixing bugs given pretty vague instructions.
I’m using Pi as my harness.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#144Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#145Earlier quoted context omitted.
i have a 128gb m4 max macbook pro i've been wanting to tinker with this stuff but genuinely never find the time. any mac users in here running similar to the above that can share their experience? i always see great debates with local stuff but the space is constantly moving goalposts and all the vernacular is pretty unfamiliar to me. i'd love to understand what people with objective experience feel they've traded aw…
If you have a 128GB Mac you really ought to try out: https://github.com/antirez/ds4 by the creator of redis. This is probably as close to it gets to state-of-the-art local LLM + agentic coding.
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#146Has anyone been storing their cc sessions for future training data on their own models? I'd love to build a system that fine-tunes on cc sessions and a good first step is capturing my own sessions well.
Yes! https://huggingface.co/changelog/agent-trace-viewer
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#147Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#148Models that you can run at home (Like Qwen 35B) aren't remotely close to Opus or GPT 5.5. Not even close. The only open models that are in that neighbor are around 1T params, so forget about running at home. It's kind of like driving a shitbox. It can often drive you from A to B, and some people will try to convince you it's fine. It's not. There's no logical reason other than absolutely requiring the privacy, doing…
> Models that you can run at home (Like Qwen 35B) aren't remotely close to Opus or GPT 5.5. Is that characterization based on some objective facts or benchmarks?
Re: Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?
#149I'm waiting to swap out my last gen Intel iMac with a new M5 mini of some kind, with the eye to hopefully be able to run some models locally. I envision a mini (heh) arms race to simply swapping out an M(X-1) for an M(X) annually as this field shakes out.