Earlier quoted context omitted.
lol They're already running at a significant loss. giving out more free stuff isnt going to help. What they really need to do is charge what it actually costs them. That will slow down the abuse a little.
That will also make it entirely unfeasible for anyone to use their services. The cost of the tokens you could burn on a $200 plan is in the neighborhood of $1200. They're getting users now and gambling on the cost of compute (or the difficulty of compute) dropping precipitously before they run out of cash.
Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
21–30 of 30 posts
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#22Is the nixpkgs repo more "resilient" to these kind of attacks since an attacker would need the approval of a member with merge permission ?
What really worries me is that on Nix we have a strong habit of patching packages to work around problems caused by the fact that NixOS doesn't use FHS. So, in theory, someone could submit an obscure patch to systemd and get everyone affected by it, if it through the approval process.
The solution so far has been a very rigorous process to even get a commit bit into nixpkgs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs-committers
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#23I’m moving all my machines to NixOS. I’d done this before but ran into time constraints creating ports for convoluted binary software. With LLMs now as good as they are it’s quite possible this isn’t a problem anymore. I’ll be finding out.
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
lol They're already running at a significant loss. giving out more free stuff isnt going to help. What they really need to do is charge what it actually costs them. That will slow down the abuse a little.
That will also make it entirely unfeasible for anyone to use their services. The cost of the tokens you could burn on a $200 plan is in the neighborhood of $1200. They're getting users now and gambling on the cost of compute (or the difficulty of compute) dropping precipitously before they run out of cash.
I think what will happen is you'll get 3 or four "Tiers" of AI.
Tier 1: Big Corpo's, Govornments and soverign wealth institutions. Top of the line and dangerous AI, very likely to be abused and used to enrich the already powerful.
Tier 2: Enterprise level AI, Rich local Gov and rich individuals might have these. maybe also SAAS providors will tap into this. Functional but not really smart like Tier 1.
Tier 3: Community AI. Small business etc will use this. basically automated orchestration
Tier 4: Home AI.
I think this is where we're headed. and this is of course after the bubble pops and we get an economic crash because of the popping. (other events going on in the world and various economies and political scenes.)
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#25Is the nixpkgs repo more "resilient" to these kind of attacks since an attacker would need the approval of a member with merge permission ?
Kinda, you'd have to go through the whole review process and also get your stuff to successfully be part of (at least) an unstable build. What really worries me is that on Nix we have a strong habit of patching packages to work around problems caused by the fact that NixOS doesn't use FHS. So, in theory, someone could submit an obscure patch to systemd and get everyone affected by it, if it through the approval proce…
Also Nixpkgs isn't really that special when it comes to patching. Making thousands of software all work coherently on a single system inevitably requires heavy amount of pop patching. Nixpkgs actually handles this better by having easier ways to make customizations.
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#26Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#27Is the nixpkgs repo more "resilient" to these kind of attacks since an attacker would need the approval of a member with merge permission ?
Assuming you're not pulling in software from outside of nixpkgs, Yes.
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Assuming you're not pulling in software from outside of nixpkgs, Yes.
Why? AFAIK original source is never reviewed, only the change in nixpkgs. So if the original is compromised, the malware will make it to nixpkgs.
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why? AFAIK original source is never reviewed, only the change in nixpkgs. So if the original is compromised, the malware will make it to nixpkgs.
The scope of nixpkgs is nixpkgs. If every package's entire source code was being audited, then there is no such thing as a sustainable repository of software. There simply isn't enough people, or money for AI, to do it.
OpenAI and Anthropic both provide free credits for OSS.
Smaller models feasibly can review every commit IMO. Would not be cheap for sure, but also would probably be cheaper than a single fulltime employee.
Re: Arch Linux AUR Hit by Another Wave of Now More Sophisticated Malware Attack
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
The scope of nixpkgs is nixpkgs. If every package's entire source code was being audited, then there is no such thing as a sustainable repository of software. There simply isn't enough people, or money for AI, to do it.
> or money for AI, to do it. OpenAI and Anthropic both provide free credits for OSS. Smaller models feasibly can review every commit IMO. Would not be cheap for sure, but also would probably be cheaper than a single fulltime employee.