Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
feralui.vercel.app
Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
1–10 of 56 posts
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#2I wish all captchas were like this. A lot more fun!
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#3>npm install playcaptcha
Imagine you get pwned for trying this out in your home project and the APT escalates to your company repos and infects your company assets, and then the post mortem comes in and you have to explain this is what infected the company it stack
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#4Time and time again, I prove that I'm human by giving this crap the finger and then visiting some other site. It's calling out a false positive and then exercising good taste.
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#5It's nothing like a claw machine. It picked up the toys twice in two tries.
A human would be incredibly suspicious of this.
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#6[deleted]
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#7The thing to grab is always on the front layer. Seems like an AI could be pretty easily trained to defeat this.
Also when you move the claw left and right, it "leans" in the wrong direction.
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#8The thing to grab is always on the front layer. Seems like an AI could be pretty easily trained to defeat this. Also when you move the claw left and right, it "leans" in the wrong direction.
I can bypass this captcha just by using gemma4
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#9It's nothing like a claw machine. It picked up the toys twice in two tries. A human would be incredibly suspicious of this.
the real CAPTCHA would be having a "this is not realistic" button that only humans would press
Re: Prove you're human by winning a claw machine
#10What makes me human?
If it is DNA then why would I need a claw machine? (Note that this defnition on DNA, which in itself is mega-odd since DNA differs, would mean that via synthetic biology one could yield humans - according to such a definition. But this does not have to be correct, so the definition would be flawed.)
If it is not DNA, how else to prove it?