Could 2x RTX5080 work just as well?
2xRTX5080 would be awesome. You'd only be able to run a q6, which it's already pretty good, but moreover you'd be able to use P2P and use Blackwell full speed, which I can't.
RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
71–80 of 116 posts
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#7280tp/s with 5080 3090 combo is wild. I’ve been working with a 4090 and two Tenstorrent p150 cards, and manage only about 30 tps utilizing all three for qwen3.6 27b q8. Guess I got more optimization to do. Would like to see the perf of their setup with and without mtp and ngram speculative decoding though, as well as parallel decode performance (once llamacpp mtp plays well with multiple slots). Being in California el…
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#73It is absolutely mind blowing to see some of the responses here. Open source, run-your-own, pay for nothing, we’re-all-nerds-that-buy-the-hardware-anyways ethos seems basically dead. I guess I’m getting old. I own two 16gb cards and I use them for models, for gpu-pasthru for gaming, 3d model rendering, etc. 14 year old me is mortified at this community.
Times are changing. The open-weight models have needed time to catch up, but they're finally at a point now where we can get almost frontier level capabilities for coding. I just wish we had a way to actually benchmark them properly though. Still seems no one has solved the problem of software architecture, brittleness and bloat as the codebase grows. Models love to add stuff, but they rarely clean up as they go. In…
Occam’s razor rings true here: where’s the money in it?
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#74That's almost exactly my setup and I'm very happy with its performance. I noticed recently that I started to prefer my local Qwen3.6 35B A3B and pi agent over Claude Code. Both fail at different tasks, and Qwen more so than Claude. But the way Qwen fails is much more straightforward. In writing tasks Qwens hallucinations and bullshitting are much easier to spot because it doesn't have the sleek vocabulary and wordsmi…
i keep seeing people talk about pi harnesses. whats this about?
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#75That's almost exactly my setup and I'm very happy with its performance. I noticed recently that I started to prefer my local Qwen3.6 35B A3B and pi agent over Claude Code. Both fail at different tasks, and Qwen more so than Claude. But the way Qwen fails is much more straightforward. In writing tasks Qwens hallucinations and bullshitting are much easier to spot because it doesn't have the sleek vocabulary and wordsmi…
I keep finding more and more usecases for Q3.6 27b (same league) and the best performance is, when answers to my question is already in the context. The moment I'm trying something open-ended or ambitious, Claude/ChatGPT clearly take you to the goal quicker. For things, where there's a way to build a knowledgebase though, the local llm definitely can be a true contender. Plus, having a big context and no worries abou…
do you mean by commanding a browser? or using APIs?
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#76It is absolutely mind blowing to see some of the responses here. Open source, run-your-own, pay for nothing, we’re-all-nerds-that-buy-the-hardware-anyways ethos seems basically dead. I guess I’m getting old. I own two 16gb cards and I use them for models, for gpu-pasthru for gaming, 3d model rendering, etc. 14 year old me is mortified at this community.
Same here. There has to be someplace like this that's managed to cultivate a better crowd, but I'll be darned if I can find it.
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#77That's almost exactly my setup and I'm very happy with its performance. I noticed recently that I started to prefer my local Qwen3.6 35B A3B and pi agent over Claude Code. Both fail at different tasks, and Qwen more so than Claude. But the way Qwen fails is much more straightforward. In writing tasks Qwens hallucinations and bullshitting are much easier to spot because it doesn't have the sleek vocabulary and wordsmi…
Not having a lot of experience with this, I ask a naive question: is there a world where you can take your local LLM and hook it up to Claude and get more Claude-like results from your local model? Obviously, there are going to be material differences in how these perform, but are we getting close to a place where this is viable? I imagine that the answers are a combination of “not yet” and “yes but it’s a lot slower…
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#78That's almost exactly my setup and I'm very happy with its performance. I noticed recently that I started to prefer my local Qwen3.6 35B A3B and pi agent over Claude Code. Both fail at different tasks, and Qwen more so than Claude. But the way Qwen fails is much more straightforward. In writing tasks Qwens hallucinations and bullshitting are much easier to spot because it doesn't have the sleek vocabulary and wordsmi…
Not having a lot of experience with this, I ask a naive question: is there a world where you can take your local LLM and hook it up to Claude and get more Claude-like results from your local model? Obviously, there are going to be material differences in how these perform, but are we getting close to a place where this is viable? I imagine that the answers are a combination of “not yet” and “yes but it’s a lot slower…
ollama launch claude --model
I would characterize it as doable, but not really viable. It's "yes you can do it but it's a lot slower", with a hint of "and the best local LLMs are on par with Haiku or Maybe Sonnet so larger and longer tasks get notably worse".Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#79Earlier quoted context omitted.
I've spent the past week trying to scheme a way to get affordable local inference of something useful (Qwen3.6-36B-A3B) for ~$500 and have come to the conclusion that it simply isn't viable. A pair of power-restricted P100s in a workstation gets close but the workstations themselves are expensive and rare as hen's teeth (not to mention loud and large). I think early '27 will be when things open up as the hardware mar…
I'm running Qwen3.6-35B-A3B on a very ordinary desktop PC (32GB DDR5, 8GB Radeon 6600XT) and getting a useful 15-20 tok/sec out of it. The MoE architecture and auto offloading from system to VRAM is just fantastic. Unsloth Q4_K_XL. The Qwen3.6-27B is unbearably slow as it doesn't fit in VRAM, though, i think the MoE is very easy to run. It is also extremely nice that you can just `apt install llama.cpp libggml0-backe…
Yesterday I downloaded Gemma4-26B with Ollama on quite rusty desktop with 1070 8gb and 32gb of ram and Core i5-9400.
I drop photo of my water meter and tell it to read the value and serial number. It was far from instant but it was also easily under 3 minutes and result was correct.
Earlier like in February I was trying the same photo with Gemma3 on the same hardware and results were bad.
Re: RTX 5080 and RTX 3090 Setup: 80 Tok/s on Qwen 3.6 27B Q8
#8090 t/s for 27B Q8 256k context
260 t/s for 35B-A3B Q8 256k context