Earlier quoted context omitted.
>100% support (10s of millions of Americans do) many of these cuts when scientists are hired because they know someone, or are part of some “group” rather than being the best choice. Prove it. Prove this happens at a large scale. This is just nonsense talking points.
[flagged]
New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
131–140 of 182 posts
Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#132Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#133Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#134Earlier quoted context omitted.
Aren't those 20 per cent of tumors more concentrated on the "intractable" side? If so, then the hyperbole is forgivable.
It does seem like those 20% are exactly on the nasty side. So even more impressive.
Anyway, since many in my family have died from this horrible cancer, its fantastic news to hear of any improvements there.
Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#135As is often the case, the title is hyperbolic. The discovery applies to 20% of tumors, and "one of cancer's significant defenses" or "a key weakness of cancer" would be more accurate. That said, I'll happily take "we discovered a key weakness in 20% of cancers," please and thank you.
Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#136Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does seem like those 20% are exactly on the nasty side. So even more impressive.
I'm no expert, and don't know if it applies in this case, but for a cancer I had (lymphoma) I was told that aggressive can often be easier to treat or "cure" (as defined by survival rates, etc.) since it also can often be hit more brutally by the treatments. Anyway, since many in my family have died from this horrible cancer, its fantastic news to hear of any improvements there.
Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#137Earlier quoted context omitted.
Isn’t glutamine also part of vegan diets? I don’t eat meat myself, but your assertion has me wondering about glutamine.
Yes, and your body requires it for things like muscle maintenance. Also, sugar is essential to what makes you you, that is, the brain requires glucose to function. The goal is to reduce excess intake of these things to reduce their availability for any cancer cells to use to grow and divide.
If you‘re specifically aiming for low glutamine, going vegan won’t cut it though, depending on what foods you leave in. Soy is high in it. Eg a glass of milk is lower glutamine than a serving of tofu.
Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#138Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cancer is not one thing, it's a huge zoo of many many many ways that cells start to break the social contract and divide in an uncontrolled manner. One of the most commonly observed broken mechanisms is mutation in the gene KRAS that turns this on/off growth switch into the permanently on position. This has been known for decades, of course. And there have been huge amounts of effort to try to develop drugs that targ…
Can we end up with a situation like antimicrobial resistance, where cancer itself evolves to resist these new treatments?
Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#139Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm no expert, and don't know if it applies in this case, but for a cancer I had (lymphoma) I was told that aggressive can often be easier to treat or "cure" (as defined by survival rates, etc.) since it also can often be hit more brutally by the treatments. Anyway, since many in my family have died from this horrible cancer, its fantastic news to hear of any improvements there.
Sorry, it does not apply ... this drug inhibits (for the first time) the KRAS mutation (previously considered "undruggable") that is the primary cause of 90% of pancreatic cancers and 50% of colon cancers.
Re: New pancreatic cancer drug might open the door to much longer survival times
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Cancer is not one thing, I know this is a popular "well actually" to do, but it is not always useful in a conversation. Yes, all cancers are different, but yes, cancer is also one thing: unchecked, harmful division of cells. Bacteria are also all different, but still they are "one thing", and despite their diversity, antibiotics exist that can deal with many species of them at once. It is reasonable to talk about b…
Benign cancers are a thing. They might not kill like they show in the Hollywood movies, but your quality of life will be significantly diminished.
No, they aren't. Cancer is malignant by definition.
There are benign non-malignant tumors.