Earlier quoted context omitted.
6 email addresses gives you 6 one months trials …
Since when did they have trials?
I’m running on my 3rd codex trial and have had a month of Gemini Pro. I think Claude is the only one without trials.
Codex for open source
71–80 of 128 posts
Re: Codex for open source
#72"6 months of ChatGPT Pro, which includes Codex" - come on, just make it free. Last time I checked OpenAI was worth $852 billion.
Re: Codex for open source
#73If you only give 6mo then this is the opposite of a commitment to open source it’s a drug dealers tactic of giving the first taste for free.
drug dealers should teach MBA classes at this point - so many strategies pioneered by them get used by large tech companies
Re: Codex for open source
#74just applied
I've forked tensorzero after they archived the repo and will be updating and fixing issues going forward.
https://github.com/agentify-sh/gateway
this is my 2nd attempt
I am using my idle codex usage but would benefit from more inference
Re: Codex for open source
#75Seems rather stingy - 6 months is barely longer than you will get on a free signup deal for a lot of online products anyway. Kind of worse than nothing if it causes you to adopt work patterns that aren't sustainable for the project after the offer ends.
Which online product gives away 6 months of a $100 per month subscription?
[deleted]
Re: Codex for open source
#76Earlier quoted context omitted.
Which online product gives away 6 months of a $100 per month subscription?
Every 2nd SaaS with a startup plan? I used intercom/customer.io/segment/amplitude/mixpanel for free for a year.
The marginal cost of all of those is definitely much lower than for Codex, though
Re: Codex for open source
#77FYI this program is ~3 months old, and Anthropic has a similar Claude for Open Source program (see https://claude.com/contact-sales/claude-for-oss ).
I applied for both. Heard back from neither. Mentioned two particular projects when applying, one with 2k stars and 5M monthly downloads, and another with 2M monthly downloads.
Now I'm wondering what the bar is since even people with millions of users aren't making the cut. I'm orders of magnitude smaller but I signed up too since I had nothing to lose. Didn't get a response, of course.
Re: Codex for open source
#78Seems rather stingy - 6 months is barely longer than you will get on a free signup deal for a lot of online products anyway. Kind of worse than nothing if it causes you to adopt work patterns that aren't sustainable for the project after the offer ends.
No good deed goes unpunished
Re: Codex for open source
#79FYI this program is ~3 months old, and Anthropic has a similar Claude for Open Source program (see https://claude.com/contact-sales/claude-for-oss ).
I applied for my oss project Filestash which satisfy all their criterias but never heard back despite the project having millions of users, more than 14000 stars on github and representing more work than a single person can cope with
[dead]
Re: Codex for open source
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Where am I going to find multiple+email@adress.es?
Using a plus sign is subaddressing [1] and most ESPs[2] will route to the main address ( multiple@addre.es) . So you can use use multiple+email@adress.es , multiple+xyz@adress.es and both will route the email to you. In my experience most SaaS apps do not filter this out and allow re-sign ups with sub-addresses. Gmail has an additional behavior that dot character is ignored in local component of the address . multipl…
This is not true (anymore?). I have a rather unfortunate exact naming collision with a family member. They use the full name without dot for the local gmail component, I use a dot between the first and last name.
Two or three mails have been misplaced in a decade.