Codex for open source
61–70 of 128 posts
Anyone know how much API credit openai offers?
Re: Codex for open source
#62These grant programs feel inconsistent—sometimes they genuinely help OSS, other times they look more like marketing. Hard to tell where the balance really lies.
Re: Codex for open source
#63Nice way of guaranteeing access to source code as training material and intelligence gathering
Re: Codex for open source
#64Re: Codex for open source
#65These grant programs feel inconsistent—sometimes they genuinely help OSS, other times they look more like marketing. Hard to tell where the balance really lies.
When in doubt, go with marketing. There are things that are 'just marketing' you wouldn't believe.
Re: Codex for open source
#66What does this clause here mean and why would they include it? https://developers.openai.com/codex/codex-for-oss-terms#7-su... Isn't the thing open source and governed by its own license?
That is interesting. I would have thought they had that right without needing to add it to the ToS.
It's better to have something in writing than to possibly have lawyers argue over it in court.
Re: Codex for open source
#67Re: Codex for open source
#68On a side note, am I the only one who feels Codex models have a higher general first-pass success rate than Claude models on coding what you want? I use Github Copilot and always find myself drifting more towards them when working.
Re: Codex for open source
#69what they do when someone switches from open source to closed source later
Re: Codex for open source
#70FYI this program is ~3 months old, and Anthropic has a similar Claude for Open Source program (see https://claude.com/contact-sales/claude-for-oss ).
I applied for my oss project Filestash which satisfy all their criterias but never heard back despite the project having millions of users, more than 14000 stars on github and representing more work than a single person can cope with